Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Tennessee

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga

Chattanooga, TN · ~49 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga runs at 219% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga: 8.3 TCR = 219% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga safety composite

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 38%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.84 per 100 workers

Safer than 38% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga: 7.0 → 9.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 9.7 TCR · DART/TCR 0.58× in 2017

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga's TCR rose 2.7 from 7.0 in 2016 to 9.7 in 2017. In 2017, DART was 0.58× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Chattanooga, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.3 · 219% of ind

  • DART 4.8 DART
  • RANK #63/100
  • PHOTO Stone Lodge
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~49 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Stone Lodge (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga averages 8.3 TCR (219% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga TCR series: 2016=7 · 2017=9.7 · BLS 3.8

Where The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #63 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga (49 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga
The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga (49 employees, TCR 8.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Chattanooga has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 9.7 4.8 6 0 0
2016 7.0 7.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TN · Chattanooga

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 695 employers in Chattanooga, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Stone Lodge 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Fox Point 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR HERITAGE WOODS OF YORKVILLE 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside of Sterling 8.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Natural Gas Utility District of Hawkins County 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE THOMAS BUILDERS INC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carter Group, LLC 49 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sain Construction Co. 49 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA COKE 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR CHATTANOOGA FOOD 8,650 FTE
CITY-NEAR USXpress 7,385 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cardiology GB 6,606 FTE
NAT-TCR Memorial Hospital 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR 321 ABC Supply Co., Inc 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR CNH_Racine_Plant 8.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Fargo (Ndfar) 8.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE AAA Worldwide Transportation 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE Village of Elk Rapids 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE AKA Tree Removal 49 FTE
NAT-SIZE N and R of Mansfield LLC 49 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.