Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Tennessee

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City

Lenoir City, TN · ~45 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City runs at 440% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City: 16.7 TCR = 440% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City safety composite

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.72 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
F 5.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 34% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.7

2016→2017

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City injury rate improved

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City's TCR fell 6.7 from 20.1 in 2016 to 13.4 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 20.1 TCR. In 2017, DART was 0.32× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=20.1 · 2017=13.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lenoir City, TN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.7 · 440% of ind

  • DART 5.4 DART
  • RANK #93/100
  • PHOTO Kingswood Senior Liv…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Kingswood Senior Living (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City averages 16.7 TCR (440% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City TCR series: 2016=20.1 · 2017=13.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 100 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Tennessee.

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City (45 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City
The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City (45 employees, TCR 16.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Lantern at Morning Pointe of Lenoir City has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 13.4 5.4 5 0 0
2016 20.1 2.9 6 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TN · Lenoir City

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 41 employers in Lenoir City, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Kingswood Senior Living 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Champaign Bickford 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Regency Village at Bend 16.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plaza 16.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE MEC Headquarters 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Advanced Power & Lighting, LLC - 230 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hollingsworth Paving Inc. 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hawkins Asphalt Paving, LLC 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hubbell Lenoir City, Inc 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 741 329 FTE
CITY-NEAR H.T.Hackney 299 FTE
CITY-NEAR 741 298 FTE
NAT-TCR McArthur - Miami - 71 Street - DTI 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 162 ABC Supply Co., Inc 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR San Diego Country Estates Timeshare Owners Association 16.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MANCO 16.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE ADS Waverly 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE A.P. Eberlein Co., Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Advance Transit, Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Clean Venture Inc. - Clayton 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.