Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities · Michigan

The Laurels of Bedford

Battle Creek, MI · ~126 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Laurels of Bedford runs at 215% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Laurels of Bedford: 14.0 TCR = 215% of Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Laurels of Bedford safety composite

The Laurels of Bedford scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 14% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Laurels of Bedford: 7.8 → 16.6 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 39.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.96× in 2024

The Laurels of Bedford's TCR rose 8.8 from 7.8 in 2016 to 16.6 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 39.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.96× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Battle Creek, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 14.0 · 215% of ind

  • DART 13.5 DART
  • RANK #404/471
  • PHOTO The Oaks at Sweeten …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 53 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Oaks at Sweeten Creek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

The Laurels of Bedford in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Laurels of Bedford averages 14.0 TCR (215% of the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Laurels of Bedford TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=5.7 · 2018=6.7 · 2019=8 · 2020=39.2 · 2024=16.6 · BLS 6.5

Where The Laurels of Bedford falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skille establishments

Safer than 14% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #404 safest of 471 Nursing Care Facilities Skille employers in Michigan.

The Laurels of Bedford (126 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Laurels of Bedford
The Laurels of Bedford (126 employees, TCR 14.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Laurels of Bedford has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.6 13.5 16 0 0
2020 39.2 37.2 8 30 0
2019 8.0 5.0 8 0 0
2018 6.7 4.8 7 0 0
2017 5.7 3.8 6 0 0
2016 7.8 6.8 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Battle Creek

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 161 employers in Battle Creek, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Oaks at Sweeten Creek 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Plantation Bay Rehabilition Center 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Charlotte Health Care Center 14.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR COLUMBUS HEALTH & REHAB, LLC 14.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Allied Power Services - DTE, Fermi Station 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE PK Contracting, LLC. Troy 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pontiac Ceiling & Partition, LLC 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Denso Manufacturing of Michigan 2,702 FTE
CITY-NEAR BRONSON BATTLE CREEK 1,530 FTE
CITY-NEAR Battle Creek HQ Corporate Office 1,118 FTE
CITY-NEAR I I Stanley Co., Inc. 729 FTE
NAT-TCR Associated Grocers of New England Inc 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR City of Downey 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Agri-Mark, Inc. 14.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Kuusakoski US, LLC 14.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Lisle 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Store 072 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bway Bryan 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shea Post Acute Rehabilitation Center 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.