Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities · Indiana

The Laurels of DeKalb

Butler, IN · ~126 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
13.3
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Laurels of DeKalb runs at 205% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Laurels of DeKalb: 13.3 TCR = 205% of Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Laurels of DeKalb safety composite

The Laurels of DeKalb scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 3%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

20/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 13.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

DART rate
F 27.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 3% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Laurels of DeKalb: 4.3 → 32.2 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 46.4 TCR · DART/TCR 2.05× in 2024

The Laurels of DeKalb's TCR rose 27.9 from 4.3 in 2016 to 32.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 46.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.05× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Butler, IN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 13.3 · 205% of ind

  • DART 27.2 DART
  • RANK #580/640
  • PHOTO DHC Springs Village …
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 25 inj
  • SIZE ~126 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DHC Springs Village Care Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

The Laurels of DeKalb in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Laurels of DeKalb averages 13.3 TCR (205% of the Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Laurels of DeKalb TCR series: 2016=4.3 · 2017=0 · 2018=2.3 · 2019=4.5 · 2020=46.4 · 2021=21.9 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=5.9 · 2024=32.2 · BLS 6.5

Where The Laurels of DeKalb falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities -Skill establishments

Safer than 15% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #580 safest of 640 Nursing Care Facilities -Skill employers in Indiana.

The Laurels of DeKalb (126 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Laurels of DeKalb
The Laurels of DeKalb (126 employees, TCR 13.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Laurels of DeKalb has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 32.2 27.2 7 19 0
2023 5.9 3.6 3 2 0
2022 2.3 1.1 2 0 0
2021 21.9 21.9 1 19 0
2020 46.4 46.4 2 40 0
2019 4.5 1.1 4 0 0
2018 2.3 2.3 2 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 4.3 4.3 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · IN · Butler

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 26 employers in Butler, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DHC Springs Village Care Center 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Paramount Meadows Nursing Center DBA Affinity Healthcare Center 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Tecumseh Operations, LLC dba Heritage Skilled Nursing and Therapy 13.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Avamere Rehabilitation of Newport 13.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE D.R. Horton, Inc. - Midwest, LLC (Indianapolis) 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rieth-Riley - South Bend 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE CASE CONSTRUCTION INC 126 FTE
STATE-SIZE E & B PAVING LLC - Muncie 126 FTE
CITY-NEAR Therma Tru 947 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics, Inc. - Flat Roll Group - Butler 918 FTE
CITY-NEAR Steel Dynamics Flat Roll Group - Butler 780 FTE
CITY-NEAR Multimatic Indiana 338 FTE
NAT-TCR Gezolan(KRAIBURG)LP 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Supply - Fresno 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR High Gear Auto Inc. DBA: Crown Delivery 13.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Police 13.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE D.R. Horton - Crown, LLC - Atlanta East 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Chisholm 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE B57 126 FTE
NAT-SIZE Western Building Group 126 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.