Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities · North Carolina

The Laurels of Pender

Burgaw, NC · ~107 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
12.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Laurels of Pender runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Laurels of Pender: 12.2 TCR = 187% of Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS 6.5 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Laurels of Pender safety composite

The Laurels of Pender scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 92% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 19%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

53/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 19% of industry peers

DART rate
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 92% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.6

2017→2024

The Laurels of Pender injury rate improved

The Laurels of Pender's TCR fell 8.6 from 8.6 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 45.0 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=8.6 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=45.0 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Burgaw, NC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 12.2 · 187% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #427/510
  • PHOTO Norlite Nursing Center
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 35 inj
  • SIZE ~107 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Norlite Nursing Center (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Laurels of Pender in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Laurels of Pender averages 12.2 TCR (187% of the Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Laurels of Pender TCR series: 2017=8.6 · 2018=5.9 · 2019=7.2 · 2020=45 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=6.3 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 6.5

Where The Laurels of Pender falls in its industry

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities -Skill establishments

Safer than 19% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #427 safest of 510 Nursing Care Facilities -Skill employers in North Carolina.

The Laurels of Pender (107 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Laurels of Pender
The Laurels of Pender (107 employees, TCR 12.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Laurels of Pender has more employees than the Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 2.1 1.1 1 1 0
2022 6.3 6.3 5 0 0
2021 22.2 22.2 1 21 0
2020 45.0 44.0 8 40 0
2019 7.2 7.2 7 0 0
2018 5.9 4.7 5 0 0
2017 8.6 8.6 8 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · NC · Burgaw

15,252 Nursing Care Facilities -Skilled Nursing Facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 23 employers in Burgaw, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Norlite Nursing Center 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sandy Springs Health and Rehabilitation Center 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Laurels of Canton 12.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Benedictine Living Community 12.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Durham Operations Center 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE Asheville Operations Center 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE I485 107 FTE
STATE-SIZE C&C Industrial, Inc 107 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pender County Government 550 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pender Memorial Hospital 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR Burgaw 223 FTE
CITY-NEAR EMS STATIONS 198 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - BFI3 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Snowmass Ski Area 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR HVA - Central 12.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Legend Smelting and Recycling, LLC 12.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE SierraThermal, Inc. 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Reliable Contractors Inc 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Age Electric, Inc. 107 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bixby Electric 107 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.