Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care

Mount Pleasant, SC · ~45 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
2.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care runs at 77% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade B.

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care: 2.9 TCR = 77% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care safety composite

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 86% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

65/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 86% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.91 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care held a steady TCR band

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care's TCR held near 0.0 from 2.9 in 2023 to 2.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 2.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=2.9 · 2024=2.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Mount Pleasant, SC AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 2.9 · 77% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #15/107
  • PHOTO Brookdale Asheboro
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~45 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Brookdale Asheboro (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care averages 2.9 TCR (77% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care TCR series: 2023=2.9 · 2024=2.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 86% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care (45 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care
The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care (45 employees, TCR 2.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Marsh Assisted Living and Memory Care has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.9 2.9 1 0 0
2023 2.9 2.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Mount Pleasant

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 55 employers in Mount Pleasant, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Asheboro 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Bellngham at Orchard A Memory Care 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10789 2.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Retreat at Albany 2.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE CBG, Inc. 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palmetto State Glass 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE US176: Columbia 216 - SG 45 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thompson Industrial Services, LLC, Division 36 45 FTE
CITY-NEAR Town Hall 719 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSA-COOPER,LLC 694 FTE
CITY-NEAR SSA-ATLANTIC ,LLC 474 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 4384 263 FTE
NAT-TCR Reliable Bronze & Mfg. Inc 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Renaissance Seattle Hotel 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Murphy Cormier General Contractor, Inc. 2.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hydrasearch, LLC 2.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE M&E Mfg. Co., Inc. 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Related Management Company LP 15 Hudson Yards 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE Museum of Arts and Sciences 45 FTE
NAT-SIZE New Jersey 45 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.