Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

The Mennonite Home

Lancaster, PA · ~557 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
6.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Mennonite Home runs at 166% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Mennonite Home: 6.3 TCR = 166% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Mennonite Home safety composite

The Mennonite Home scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 56% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

54/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 6.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 56% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 54% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.6

2017→2024

The Mennonite Home injury rate improved

The Mennonite Home's TCR fell 6.6 from 10.6 in 2017 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.47× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=10.6 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=6.0 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Lancaster, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 6.3 · 166% of ind

  • DART 2.9 DART
  • RANK #111/257
  • PHOTO Blue Ridge Senior Ho…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 153 inj
  • SIZE ~557 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue Ridge Senior Housing LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Mennonite Home in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Mennonite Home averages 6.3 TCR (166% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Mennonite Home TCR series: 2017=10.6 · 2018=5.6 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=6 · 2022=4.2 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Mennonite Home falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 56% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #111 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

The Mennonite Home (557 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Mennonite Home
The Mennonite Home (557 employees, TCR 6.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Mennonite Home has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 2.9 15 0 0
2023 3.5 2.6 11 1 0
2022 4.2 2.3 11 2 0
2021 6.0 4.9 14 8 0
2020 11.8 10.8 14 34 0
2019 4.9 4.2 23 0 0
2018 5.6 4.5 21 0 0
2017 10.6 8.2 44 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Lancaster

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 450 employers in Lancaster, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Senior Housing LLC 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bridgewater Park Health & Rehab 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Oak Trace 6.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Northwest Hills 6.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Br 101 & 990- Communications Test Design Inc 557 FTE
STATE-SIZE PA - Zara 557 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sunoco Ellis Administrative 557 FTE
STATE-SIZE New Holland Plant 558 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Health, LGH Hospital 7,424 FTE
CITY-NEAR LGHealth 7,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Hospital 6,528 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lancaster General Medical Group 1,436 FTE
NAT-TCR Ft Wayne in 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Sardis Community Nursing Home 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Ashland Springs Hotel 6.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Frr-Inc-Falcon Ridge Ranch 6.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE CA - Vernon - 3220 E. 26th St - The American Bottling Company 557 FTE
NAT-SIZE Oak Valley Hospital District 557 FTE
NAT-SIZE 330 Community Dr 557 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bell Nursery - Store Employees 557 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.