Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) · Michigan

The Oaks at Byron Center

Byron Center, MI · ~98 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.2
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Oaks at Byron Center runs at 264% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) workplace, earning a grade F.

The Oaks at Byron Center: 17.2 TCR = 264% of Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS 6.5 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Oaks at Byron Center safety composite

The Oaks at Byron Center scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.16 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.96 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−8.2

2020→2024

The Oaks at Byron Center injury rate improved

The Oaks at Byron Center's TCR fell 8.2 from 15.2 in 2020 to 7.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 23.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.41× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=15.2 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=23.5 · 2023=18.0 · 2024=7.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Byron Center, MI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.2 · 264% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #433/471
  • PHOTO 9288-A17
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 60 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 9288-A17 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

The Oaks at Byron Center in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Oaks at Byron Center averages 17.2 TCR (264% of the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Oaks at Byron Center TCR series: 2020=15.2 · 2021=22.2 · 2022=23.5 · 2023=18 · 2024=7 · BLS 6.5

Where The Oaks at Byron Center falls in its industry

15,252 Convalescent homes or convales establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #433 safest of 471 Convalescent homes or convales employers in Michigan.

The Oaks at Byron Center (98 employees, TCR 17.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Oaks at Byron Center
The Oaks at Byron Center (98 employees, TCR 17.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Oaks at Byron Center has fewer employees than the Convalescent homes or convalescent hospi median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 7.0 6 0 0
2023 18.0 16.8 16 0 0
2022 23.5 21.4 13 9 0
2021 22.2 20.9 17 1 0
2020 15.2 12.2 8 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · MI · Byron Center

15,252 Convalescent homes or convalescent hospitals (except psychiatric) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 78 employers in Byron Center, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 9288-A17 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Advance Rehab Center of Tustin 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Gate Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 17.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wallace Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 17.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lansing Office 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE 4039-03822500-00W001 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE D&W MECHANICAL 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition, LLC 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Buist Electric 390 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lumbermen's Inc. Byron Center 344 FTE
CITY-NEAR Masterpiece Flower Company LLC 303 FTE
CITY-NEAR Van Eerden Trucking 254 FTE
NAT-TCR BCD, Inc. 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0223 San Diego 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Police Department 17.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Hancock County Senior Services 17.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Enteprise Rent-A-Car 03RN 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Farmington Station Assisted Living Residence 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Orwigsburg Center Rehabilitation and Nursing Center LLC 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE COH Police North Patrol 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.