Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing · Illinois

The Pate Company

Lombard, IL · ~37 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Pate Company runs at 149% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

The Pate Company: 4.9 TCR = 149% of Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Pate Company safety composite

The Pate Company scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 45% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.06 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Pate Company: 2.8 → 7.1 TCR

Peak year 2018 @ 11.4 TCR · DART/TCR 1.43× in 2024

The Pate Company's TCR rose 4.3 from 2.8 in 2016 to 7.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 332322 · Lombard, IL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.9 · 149% of ind

  • DART 7.1 DART
  • RANK #37/54
  • PHOTO Captive-Aire Systems…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 17 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Captive-Aire Systems Inc - Youngsville, NC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Illinois employers → · Look up another →

The Pate Company in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Pate Company averages 4.9 TCR (149% of the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Pate Company TCR series: 2016=2.8 · 2017=5.5 · 2018=11.4 · 2019=4.9 · 2020=0 · 2021=7.6 · 2022=5.1 · 2023=0 · 2024=7.1 · BLS 3.3

Where The Pate Company falls in its industry

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stamp establishments

Safer than 45% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Illinois alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 54 Sheet metal work (except stamp employers in Illinois.

The Pate Company (37 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Pate Company
The Pate Company (37 employees, TCR 4.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 58 employees and a TCR of 4.5

The Pate Company has fewer employees than the Sheet metal work (except stampings) manu median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.1 7.1 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 5.1 5.1 2 0 0
2021 7.6 5.1 3 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 4.9 2.4 2 0 0
2018 11.4 8.6 4 0 0
2017 5.5 2.7 2 0 0
2016 2.8 2.8 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

332322 · IL · Lombard

1,158 Sheet metal work (except stampings) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,804 rated employers in Illinois with headcount on file · 133 employers in Lombard, IL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Captive-Aire Systems Inc - Youngsville, NC 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR C.L. Rieckhoff, Co. 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR IntelliMetal Inc DBA AJL Manufacturing 4.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Conquest Manufacturing LLC 4.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Curtis Orchard Ltd 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Tuscola 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Lewis Seed Farms, Inc. - Ursa 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Aurora Fleet Facility 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR XLT Management Services, Inc. 6,590 FTE
CITY-NEAR Program Productions, LLC 5,622 FTE
CITY-NEAR Power Wellness Management 1,430 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lombard Park District 342 FTE
NAT-TCR Tiff's Treats - A8 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Hartford 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Crestview Personal Care/Assisted Living 4.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 42F5/4225 Enterprise Leasing Company of Florida, LLC, Tampa Division 4.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE 45 Norton St 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE The Bedwell Company 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Transystems LLC - Summer Construction Hauling Project 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Foam Products Corporation 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.