Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Colorado

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail

Lafayette, CO · ~78 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail runs at 98% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail: 3.7 TCR = 98% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail safety composite

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 79% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.74 per 100 workers

Safer than 79% of industry peers

DART rate
C 1.59 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.2

2018→2021

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail injury rate improved

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail's TCR fell 5.2 from 6.8 in 2018 to 1.6 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.8 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=6.8 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=1.0 · 2021=1.6

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Lafayette, CO AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.7 · 98% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #13/140
  • PHOTO 10477
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~78 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 10477 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail averages 3.7 TCR (98% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail TCR series: 2018=6.8 · 2019=5.5 · 2020=1 · 2021=1.6 · BLS 3.8

Where The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 79% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #13 safest of 140 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Colorado.

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail (78 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail
The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail (78 employees, TCR 3.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Peaks at Old Laramie Trail has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 1.6 1.6 1 0 0
2020 1.0 0.0 1 0 0
2019 5.5 3.7 3 0 0
2018 6.8 1.7 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CO · Lafayette

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 60 employers in Lafayette, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 10477 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-60098 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Promenade Chestnut Ridge 3.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Trail 3.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Colorado First Construction dba CFC Construction Inc. 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE RECONSTRUCTION EXPERTS, INC - DENVER 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE JFSNA at Suncor Commerce City 78 FTE
STATE-SIZE EAP Glass 78 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Hospital 1,484 FTE
CITY-NEAR Good Samaritan Medical Center 1,319 FTE
CITY-NEAR Imagine! 773 FTE
CITY-NEAR Developmental Disabilities Center dba Imagine! 700 FTE
NAT-TCR Redwood Empire Vineyard Management 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR MHC 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Winsted 3.7 TCR
NAT-TCR HF Optimeyes Westland Super 3.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Heartis Fayetteville 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Greenhaven Estates Assisted Living 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bio Star Films, LLC 78 FTE
NAT-SIZE Madison Hospice 78 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.