Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

The Phoenix at Milton

Milton, GA · ~62 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
12.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Phoenix at Milton runs at 324% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Phoenix at Milton: 12.3 TCR = 324% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Phoenix at Milton safety composite

The Phoenix at Milton scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 12.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.01 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−15.5

2021→2024

The Phoenix at Milton injury rate improved

The Phoenix at Milton's TCR fell 15.5 from 23.5 in 2021 to 8.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 23.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.65× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=23.5 · 2022=15.8 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=8.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Milton, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 12.3 · 324% of ind

  • DART 8.0 DART
  • RANK #161/205
  • PHOTO The Bellingham at Or…
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 8 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Bellingham at Orchard A Memory Care Residence (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

The Phoenix at Milton in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Phoenix at Milton averages 12.3 TCR (324% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Phoenix at Milton TCR series: 2021=23.5 · 2022=15.8 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Phoenix at Milton falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 20% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #161 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

The Phoenix at Milton (62 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Phoenix at Milton
The Phoenix at Milton (62 employees, TCR 12.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Phoenix at Milton has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.0 8.0 4 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 15.8 15.8 2 6 0
2021 23.5 23.5 1 9 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Milton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 12 employers in Milton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Bellingham at Orchard A Memory Care Residence 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR ShII - Raynham 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bon Secours Place St Petersbeurg 12.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Grand Villa Altamonte Springs 12.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE JACKSON EMC - JEFFERSON 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Minola Operating 5215 Minola Dr 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Brunswick Operating and Transmission Maintenance Center - 3951 & 3915 Community Rd. 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bloomington 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR IJILITY LLC 642 FTE
CITY-NEAR Exide Technologies 331 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2431 - Milton 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1264 - Milton 96 FTE
NAT-TCR Weaver Metal & Roofing, Inc. 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Hotel aka Brickell 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Nywin - New Windsor 12.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Njldh - Lyndhurst 12.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE T3 Contractors Corp 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Amazon.com Services LLC - HMI2 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of Milaca 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Allina Health Forest Lake Clinic 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.