Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Georgia

The Phoenix at Union Hill

Canton, GA · ~47 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
17.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Phoenix at Union Hill runs at 471% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Phoenix at Union Hill: 17.9 TCR = 471% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Phoenix at Union Hill safety composite

The Phoenix at Union Hill scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 7%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 17.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 7% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−27.6

2021→2024

The Phoenix at Union Hill injury rate improved

The Phoenix at Union Hill's TCR fell 27.6 from 40.5 in 2021 to 12.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 87.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.54× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2021=40.5 · 2022=87.2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=12.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Canton, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 17.9 · 471% of ind

  • DART 9.7 DART
  • RANK #189/205
  • PHOTO Ivy Park at La Palma
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 36 inj
  • SIZE ~47 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ivy Park at La Palma (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

The Phoenix at Union Hill in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Phoenix at Union Hill averages 17.9 TCR (471% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Phoenix at Union Hill TCR series: 2021=40.5 · 2022=87.2 · 2023=0.2 · 2024=12.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Phoenix at Union Hill falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 7% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #189 safest of 205 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

The Phoenix at Union Hill (47 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Phoenix at Union Hill
The Phoenix at Union Hill (47 employees, TCR 17.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Phoenix at Union Hill has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.9 9.7 8 0 0
2023 0.2 0.1 4 0 0
2022 87.2 66.1 11 22 0
2021 40.5 24.8 13 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · GA · Canton

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 73 employers in Canton, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ivy Park at La Palma 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Addington Place of Titusville 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Washington Pointe Las Colinas 17.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Spring Hills Somerset 17.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE SS-Harvest South 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Athens TMC 1004 Boulevard Athens GA 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Colquitt Electric Membership Corporation - Valdosta 47 FTE
STATE-SIZE Austell Operating - 2525 Old Alabama Rd. Austell 47 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside Hospital Cherokee 3,016 FTE
CITY-NEAR Pilgrims Pride Corp 748 FTE
CITY-NEAR Processing Plant 747 FTE
CITY-NEAR Universal Alloy Corporation Canton 402 FTE
NAT-TCR Riverview SNF Operator LLC 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 5061 Logistics 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Echo Park Pool 17.9 TCR
NAT-TCR North Country Chevrolte Buick Gmc 17.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mission Point of Roscommon 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hartley Feeders 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steel Warehouse of Illinois 47 FTE
NAT-SIZE Salem Electric 47 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.