Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building · New York

The Pike Companies LTD

Rochester, NY · ~55 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.6
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Pike Companies LTD runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building workplace, earning a grade B.

The Pike Companies LTD: 1.6 TCR = 57% of Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS 2.9 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Pike Companies LTD safety composite

The Pike Companies LTD scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 30%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

48/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 1.64 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

DART rate
F 1.7 per 100 workers

Safer than 30% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Pike Companies LTD: 0.0 → 1.7 TCR

Peak year 2017 @ 3.2 TCR · DART/TCR 1.04× in 2018

The Pike Companies LTD's TCR rose 1.7 from 0.0 in 2016 to 1.7 in 2018. Peak filing year was 2017 at 3.2 TCR. In 2018, DART was 1.04× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236220 · Rochester, NY AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.6 · 57% of ind

  • DART 1.7 DART
  • RANK #79/218
  • PHOTO Fulcrum Construction…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~55 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fulcrum Construction, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New York employers → · Look up another →

The Pike Companies LTD in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Pike Companies LTD averages 1.6 TCR (57% of the Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Pike Companies LTD TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=3.2 · 2018=1.7 · BLS 2.9

Where The Pike Companies LTD falls in its industry

4,692 Addition, alteration and renov establishments

Safer than 63% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New York alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #79 safest of 218 Addition, alteration and renov employers in New York.

The Pike Companies LTD (55 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 02468 Average employees Total Case Rate The Pike Companies LTD
The Pike Companies LTD (55 employees, TCR 1.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 55 employees and a TCR of 2.3

The Pike Companies LTD has more employees than the Addition, alteration and renovation, com median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2018 1.7 1.7 1 0 0
2017 3.2 3.2 2 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236220 · NY · Rochester

4,692 Addition, alteration and renovation, commercial and institutional building employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 21,008 rated employers in New York with headcount on file · 956 employers in Rochester, NY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fulcrum Construction, Inc 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR SPAN Construction and Engineering 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inline Commercial Construction Inc. 1.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR B-D Construction Inc. 1.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Satur Farms LLC 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE Yonkers Service Center 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE National Fuel Distribution Orchard Park Servicenter 55 FTE
STATE-SIZE INA-Syracuse 55 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 50 University of Rochester 13,244 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rochester General Hospital 7,833 FTE
CITY-NEAR Division 40 University of Rochester 4,884 FTE
CITY-NEAR Unity Hospital 3,158 FTE
NAT-TCR Endeavor 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Shopko Hometown #773 (Lewistown, MT) 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Farmers Co-OP 1.6 TCR
NAT-TCR QSI-Russellville 1.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE North Hampton Nursing & Rehabilitation 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Compassionate Care Hospice of Taunton 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Angleboard 55 FTE
NAT-SIZE Gulf Copper South Yard 55 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.