Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · California

The Pines Merrill Gardens

Rocklin, CA · ~79 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Pines Merrill Gardens runs at 121% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Pines Merrill Gardens: 4.6 TCR = 121% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Pines Merrill Gardens safety composite

The Pines Merrill Gardens scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 72% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 16%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

47/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 72% of industry peers

DART rate
F 9.9 per 100 workers

Safer than 16% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Pines Merrill Gardens: 0.1 → 18.1 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 18.1 TCR · DART/TCR 2.15× in 2024

The Pines Merrill Gardens's TCR rose 18.1 from 0.1 in 2021 to 18.1 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 2.15× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Rocklin, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 4.6 · 121% of ind

  • DART 9.9 DART
  • RANK #94/635
  • PHOTO The Gallery at Spokane
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 28 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Gallery at Spokane (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Pines Merrill Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Pines Merrill Gardens averages 4.6 TCR (121% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Pines Merrill Gardens TCR series: 2021=0.1 · 2022=0.2 · 2023=0 · 2024=18.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Pines Merrill Gardens falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 72% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #94 safest of 635 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in California.

The Pines Merrill Gardens (79 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Pines Merrill Gardens
The Pines Merrill Gardens (79 employees, TCR 4.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Pines Merrill Gardens has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 18.1 9.9 11 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 7 2 0
2022 0.2 0.1 6 8 0
2021 0.1 0.1 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · CA · Rocklin

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 127 employers in Rocklin, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Gallery at Spokane 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mission Oaks Senior Living, LLC 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Southfield 4.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale BLuewater Bay 4.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Crisalida Berry Farms, LLC 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE L E Cooke Co 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE MOBI'S 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Sun Pacific Farming | Citrus Farming | Maricopa 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR California Department of Transportation Facility 75 2,413 FTE
CITY-NEAR Infinity Energy Inc. 676 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ace Hardware Retail Support Center 562 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sacramento Retail Support Center - Ace Hardware 515 FTE
NAT-TCR New Community Health Care Inc 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Accolade Healthcare of East Peoria 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Cousino High School 4.6 TCR
NAT-TCR National Management Resources Alma College 4.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Baker Hill Industries, Inc 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE PHL-ITP 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynomax Inc. 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pioneer Masonry Restoration Company 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.