Senior citizens' homes without nursing care · North Carolina

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living

Charlotte, NC · ~59 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living runs at 105% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Senior citizens' homes without nursing care workplace, earning a grade C.

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living: 4.0 TCR = 105% of Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living safety composite

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 77% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 44%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

59/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 77% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 44% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−80.0

2022→2024

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living injury rate improved

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living's TCR fell 80.0 from 86.1 in 2022 to 6.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 86.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.02× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=86.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=6.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Charlotte, NC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 4.0 · 105% of ind

  • DART 4.0 DART
  • RANK #100/356
  • PHOTO Ohio Living - Villag…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~59 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Ohio Living - Village HHH (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · North Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Pines on Carmel Senior Living averages 4.0 TCR (105% of the Senior citizens' homes without nursing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living TCR series: 2022=86.1 · 2023=1.9 · 2024=6.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Pines on Carmel Senior Living falls in its industry

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without establishments

Safer than 77% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to North Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #100 safest of 356 Senior citizens' homes without employers in North Carolina.

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living (59 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Pines on Carmel Senior Living
The Pines on Carmel Senior Living (59 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Pines on Carmel Senior Living has more employees than the Senior citizens' homes without nursing c median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 6.1 4.0 3 0 0
2023 1.9 0.0 1 0 0
2022 86.1 0.0 6 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · NC · Charlotte

6,510 Senior citizens' homes without nursing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,981 rated employers in North Carolina with headcount on file · 2,058 employers in Charlotte, NC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Ohio Living - Village HHH 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mocksville Senior Living 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Eden Heights of Olean 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sterling Place 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE The Christman Company - NC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pike Mississippi Statewide Operations 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rifenburg North Carolina, LLC 59 FTE
STATE-SIZE North Carolina - 03 59 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1101-Carolinas Medical Center (1101) 8,444 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0001-Carolinas Medical Center 8,032 FTE
CITY-NEAR 4795-AA-CLT-CHARLOTTE-CLT-TRML 7,295 FTE
CITY-NEAR Novant Health Presbyterian Medical Center 4,973 FTE
NAT-TCR Ossineke Industries 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 2744 Hin44 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Clarkson Healthcare 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Culver Duck Farms, Inc. 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE South Hills 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Circle Furniture Holdings 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Astoria 38th St 59 FTE
NAT-SIZE Facility 545 59 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.