Skilled nursing facilities · Colorado

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood

Wheat Ridge, CO · ~110 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
7.0
Avg TCR
6.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood runs at 108% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Skilled nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood: 7.0 TCR = 108% of Skilled nursing facilities BLS 6.5 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood safety composite

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 15%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

36/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.02 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

DART rate
F 10.62 per 100 workers

Safer than 15% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood: 7.2 → 10.6 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 10.6 TCR · DART/TCR 1.51× in 2024

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood's TCR rose 3.4 from 7.2 in 2016 to 10.6 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 1.51× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623110 · Wheat Ridge, CO ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 7.0 · 108% of ind

  • DART 10.6 DART
  • RANK #93/259
  • PHOTO Waters of Winchester
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 32 inj
  • SIZE ~110 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Waters of Winchester (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Colorado employers → · Look up another →

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood averages 7.0 TCR (108% of the Skilled nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood TCR series: 2016=7.2 · 2017=6.2 · 2021=6 · 2022=2.3 · 2023=9.7 · 2024=10.6 · BLS 6.5

Where The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood falls in its industry

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities establishments

Safer than 46% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Colorado alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #93 safest of 259 Skilled nursing facilities employers in Colorado.

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood (110 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood
The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood (110 employees, TCR 7.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 106 employees and a TCR of 6.6

The Rehabilitation Center at Sandalwood has more employees than the Skilled nursing facilities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 10.6 10.6 4 0 0
2023 9.7 3.6 8 0 0
2022 2.3 1.2 2 0 0
2021 6.0 3.6 5 0 0
2017 6.2 5.2 6 0 0
2016 7.2 5.2 7 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623110 · CO · Wheat Ridge

15,252 Skilled nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 9,007 rated employers in Colorado with headcount on file · 56 employers in Wheat Ridge, CO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Waters of Winchester 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Echoing Woods Residential Center 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Pearl of Naperville 7.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Premier Estates of Kenesaw 7.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Rocky Mountain Midstream 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE DMEA 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE I25 South Gap 061911 110 FTE
STATE-SIZE Castle Rock Construction Company of Colorado LLC 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lutheran Medical Center 1,912 FTE
CITY-NEAR SiteWise Corporation 432 FTE
CITY-NEAR Rocky Mountain Bottle Company 239 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2021 - Arvada South 213 FTE
NAT-TCR Victorville 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Sdmob - Mobridge 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Yeadon 10280 7.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Barnes Place 7.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Danbury Broadview Heights 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Charles A. Klein and Sons, Inc 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE Safire Rehabilitation of Southtowns 110 FTE
NAT-SIZE American Communications Construction, Inc. 110 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.