Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Connecticut

The Residence at Glastonbury

Glastonbury, CT · ~85 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Glastonbury runs at 444% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residence at Glastonbury: 16.9 TCR = 444% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Glastonbury safety composite

The Residence at Glastonbury scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 53% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 9%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

35/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 9% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.07 per 100 workers

Safer than 53% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−42.6

2023→2024

The Residence at Glastonbury injury rate improved

The Residence at Glastonbury's TCR fell 42.6 from 59.5 in 2023 to 16.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 59.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2023=59.5 · 2024=16.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Glastonbury, CT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 16.9 · 444% of ind

  • DART 3.1 DART
  • RANK #37/43
  • PHOTO Pueblo Retirement Co…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 12 inj
  • SIZE ~85 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pueblo Retirement Community LLC dba Primrose of Pueblo (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Connecticut employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Glastonbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Glastonbury averages 16.9 TCR (444% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Glastonbury TCR series: 2023=59.5 · 2024=16.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Glastonbury falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 9% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Connecticut alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #37 safest of 43 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Connecticut.

The Residence at Glastonbury (85 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Glastonbury
The Residence at Glastonbury (85 employees, TCR 16.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Residence at Glastonbury has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 16.9 3.1 11 0 0
2023 59.5 49.5 1 5 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CT · Glastonbury

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,008 rated employers in Connecticut with headcount on file · 61 employers in Glastonbury, CT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pueblo Retirement Community LLC dba Primrose of Pueblo 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Amber Way/Wyndham West 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Silverado The Woodlands - 228 16.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose Lease Management dba Primrose of Duluth 16.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Greenskies Clean Energy LLC 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE ITW Graphics 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE 570 - Hartford 85 FTE
STATE-SIZE Thinklogical, A Belden Brand 85 FTE
CITY-NEAR Company Wide 583 FTE
CITY-NEAR TheKey - CT, Glastonbury (100 Western Blvd.) 434 FTE
CITY-NEAR Glastonbury Town Hall 406 FTE
CITY-NEAR 10336 Glastonbury 290 FTE
NAT-TCR Brix Marine 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northern Region : Huu 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mndul - Duluth 16.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Mt. Bachelor Sports Education Foundation 16.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Aspirus Ontonagon Hospital 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Brookestone View 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Action Service Corp 85 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maui Disposal Co. Inc. 85 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.