Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Massachusetts

The Residence at Orchard Grove

Shrewsbury, MA · ~61 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
14.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Orchard Grove runs at 391% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Residence at Orchard Grove: 14.9 TCR = 391% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Orchard Grove safety composite

The Residence at Orchard Grove scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 73% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 13%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 14.86 per 100 workers

Safer than 13% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.08 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Residence at Orchard Grove held a steady TCR band

The Residence at Orchard Grove's TCR held near 0.1 from 0.0 in 2017 to 0.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 41.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.01× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=0.0 · 2018=24.0 · 2019=17.9 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=41.6 · 2023=18.3 · 2024=0.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Shrewsbury, MA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 14.9 · 391% of ind

  • DART 0.1 DART
  • RANK #69/80
  • PHOTO Pointe Frontier
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 34 inj
  • SIZE ~61 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Pointe Frontier (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Massachusetts employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Orchard Grove in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Orchard Grove averages 14.9 TCR (391% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Orchard Grove TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=24 · 2019=17.9 · 2020=9.8 · 2021=7.1 · 2022=41.6 · 2023=18.3 · 2024=0.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Orchard Grove falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 13% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Massachusetts alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 80 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Massachusetts.

The Residence at Orchard Grove (61 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Orchard Grove
The Residence at Orchard Grove (61 employees, TCR 14.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Residence at Orchard Grove has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.1 0.1 7 0 0
2023 18.3 14.7 3 7 0
2022 41.6 39.6 2 19 0
2021 7.1 4.7 2 1 0
2020 9.8 5.9 4 1 0
2019 17.9 9.0 8 0 0
2018 24.0 0.0 8 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MA · Shrewsbury

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,108 rated employers in Massachusetts with headcount on file · 57 employers in Shrewsbury, MA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Pointe Frontier 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Flagstone Senior Living 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cadence at Millbrae 14.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Twining Village 14.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE M. Holland & Sons Construction, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE P. J. Albert, Inc. 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE 5020 - Halifax, MA 61 FTE
STATE-SIZE Manafort Transit 61 FTE
CITY-NEAR MA-02 4,429 FTE
CITY-NEAR MAWOR - WORCESTER 1,202 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORCESTER (MAWOR) 1,170 FTE
CITY-NEAR 249623-CENTRAL MA P&DC 508 FTE
NAT-TCR Pointe Frontier 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Harris Realty Company LLC 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Yankee Hill Brick Manufacturer Company 14.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Starboard Logistics LLC 14.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE SP Richards Co. 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Buerkle Imports Company Inc 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE Steve's Electric, LLC 61 FTE
NAT-SIZE HEXPOL Barberton 61 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.