Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Florida

The Residence at Timber Pines

Spring Hill, FL · ~169 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Timber Pines runs at 125% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Residence at Timber Pines: 4.8 TCR = 125% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Timber Pines safety composite

The Residence at Timber Pines scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 71% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

64/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.75 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.83 per 100 workers

Safer than 66% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−6.5

2016→2024

The Residence at Timber Pines injury rate improved

The Residence at Timber Pines's TCR fell 6.5 from 9.0 in 2016 to 2.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 12.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=12.6 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=5.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Spring Hill, FL ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.8 · 125% of ind

  • DART 0.8 DART
  • RANK #128/396
  • PHOTO Heritage Woods of Mc…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 45 inj
  • SIZE ~169 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Heritage Woods of McHenry (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Timber Pines in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Timber Pines averages 4.8 TCR (125% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Timber Pines TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=12.6 · 2018=4.5 · 2019=2.8 · 2020=5.9 · 2022=0.8 · 2023=0 · 2024=2.5 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Timber Pines falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 71% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #128 safest of 396 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

The Residence at Timber Pines (169 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Timber Pines
The Residence at Timber Pines (169 employees, TCR 4.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Residence at Timber Pines has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.5 0.8 3 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.8 0.0 1 0 0
2020 5.9 4.5 6 2 0
2019 2.8 0.7 4 0 0
2018 4.5 3.7 5 1 0
2017 12.6 5.5 15 1 0
2016 9.0 3.8 11 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · FL · Spring Hill

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 53 employers in Spring Hill, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of McHenry 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Westside Garden Plaza 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 63001 SUNRISE OF EDMONDS 4.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 2248-63105 4.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Pacific Tomato Growers, Ltd. - 301 Packing House 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carroll Bradford Inc. 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Adena Lakeland 169 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heart Utilities, Inc. 169 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 967 401 FTE
CITY-NEAR 967 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bayfront Health Spring Hill 209 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0813 181 FTE
NAT-TCR NU-ME 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Magic Mile, LLC 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR LMMM Houston #61, LTD 4.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Heritage Woods of McHenry 4.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Niles Precision Company 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Elevate Care Northbrook 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Regency at Waterford 169 FTE
NAT-SIZE Omni Continuing Care 169 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.