Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Pennsylvania

The Residence at Whitehall

Pittsburgh, PA · ~62 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence at Whitehall runs at 101% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Residence at Whitehall: 3.9 TCR = 101% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence at Whitehall safety composite

The Residence at Whitehall scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

73/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 3.85 per 100 workers

Safer than 78% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

The Residence at Whitehall held a steady TCR band

The Residence at Whitehall's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2020 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 16.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=0.0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=16.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Pittsburgh, PA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 3.9 · 101% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #47/233
  • PHOTO Cape Cod Senior Resi…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 5 inj
  • SIZE ~62 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cape Cod Senior Residences (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Residence at Whitehall in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence at Whitehall averages 3.9 TCR (101% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence at Whitehall TCR series: 2020=0 · 2021=3.1 · 2022=0 · 2023=16.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence at Whitehall falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 78% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #47 safest of 233 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Pennsylvania.

The Residence at Whitehall (62 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence at Whitehall
The Residence at Whitehall (62 employees, TCR 3.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Residence at Whitehall has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 16.1 16.1 4 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 3.1 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · PA · Pittsburgh

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 1,170 employers in Pittsburgh, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cape Cod Senior Residences 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gardens of Nashville 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Williamston House 3.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Colonnade at Northdale 3.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Kreider Farms - Specialty Egg 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE AGC Flat Glass 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE W.S. Cumby 62 FTE
STATE-SIZE Poole Anderson Construction 62 FTE
CITY-NEAR United States Steel COrporation 15,229 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh- Oakland 14,135 FTE
CITY-NEAR UPMC Presbyterian Shadyside (PUH) 13,900 FTE
CITY-NEAR University of Pittsburgh-Oakland 13,208 FTE
NAT-TCR Store 0662 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR KERMAN 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1119 3.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1306 3.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE VCSS Manteca 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Floor Factors 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE Protected Cargo Transport LLC 62 FTE
NAT-SIZE J&S Masonry 62 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.