Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Ohio

The Residence of Chardon

Chardon, OH · ~36 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Residence of Chardon runs at 44% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade A.

The Residence of Chardon: 1.7 TCR = 44% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Residence of Chardon safety composite

The Residence of Chardon scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 95% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 43%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 1.67 per 100 workers

Safer than 95% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 43% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−122.5

2017→2024

The Residence of Chardon injury rate improved

The Residence of Chardon's TCR fell 122.5 from 126.6 in 2017 to 4.1 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2017 at 126.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 2.46× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=126.6 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0.0 · 2024=4.1

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Chardon, OH AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.7 · 44% of ind

  • DART 4.1 DART
  • RANK #16/243
  • PHOTO 6948_15980
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 3 inj
  • SIZE ~36 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: 6948_15980 (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Residence of Chardon in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Residence of Chardon averages 1.7 TCR (44% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Residence of Chardon TCR series: 2017=126.6 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · 2021=4.2 · 2022=0 · 2024=4.1 · BLS 3.8

Where The Residence of Chardon falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 95% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #16 safest of 243 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Ohio.

The Residence of Chardon (36 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Residence of Chardon
The Residence of Chardon (36 employees, TCR 1.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Residence of Chardon has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.1 4.1 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.2 0.0 1 0 0
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 126.6 126.6 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · OH · Chardon

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 39 employers in Chardon, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR 6948_15980 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Vero at Bethlehem 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Landings of Kaukauna 1.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wyndham Residence 1.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE STEYER SEEDS LLC 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE Biosecurity Building 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE BrennCo Inc 36 FTE
STATE-SIZE EAST CREEK FARM LLC 36 FTE
CITY-NEAR Geauga Medical Center 1,024 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3293 315 FTE
CITY-NEAR 3293 287 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chardon Pentair Water Filtration 221 FTE
NAT-TCR Rain CII Carbon - Robinson 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Erlanger - Cox Rd 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Beckley ARH Medical Mall 1.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Mammoet USA South INC. 1.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Brookdale Hattiesburg I 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE AZZ Surface Technologies - Terrell LLC 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE 5269 - Norcross South 36 FTE
NAT-SIZE Holiday Inn Express Suites Fort Lauderdale Airport W. 36 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.