Hotels (except casino hotels) · District of Columbia

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C.

Washington, DC · ~213 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
3.1
Avg TCR
3.0
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. runs at 103% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Hotels (except casino hotels) workplace, earning a grade C.

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C.: 3.1 TCR = 103% of Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS 3.0 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. safety composite

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 70% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 49%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 3.09 per 100 workers

Safer than 70% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.65 per 100 workers

Safer than 49% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2022→2023

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. injury rate improved

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C.'s TCR fell 1.2 from 3.7 in 2022 to 2.5 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 3.7 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=3.7 · 2023=2.5

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 721110 · Washington, DC ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 3.1 · 103% of ind

  • DART 1.6 DART
  • RANK #24/71
  • PHOTO Emerald Beach Resort
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~213 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Emerald Beach Resort (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · District of Columbia employers → · Look up another →

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. averages 3.1 TCR (103% of the Hotels (except casino hotels) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. TCR series: 2022=3.7 · 2023=2.5 · BLS 3.0

Where The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. falls in its industry

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) establishments

Safer than 70% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to District of Columbia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 71 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers in District of Columbia.

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. (213 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C.
The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. (213 employees, TCR 3.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 48 employees and a TCR of 4.8

The Ritz-Carlton, Washington, D.C. has more employees than the Hotels (except casino hotels) median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 2.5 1.6 5 1 0
2022 3.7 3.3 9 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

721110 · DC · Washington

9,342 Hotels (except casino hotels) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 793 rated employers in District of Columbia with headcount on file · 748 employers in Washington, DC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Emerald Beach Resort 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sheraton Philadelphia University City Hotel 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR GRAD Seattle 3.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR UPH Lakeside LP dba Hilton Charlotte University Place 3.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE USAID US DC Macf USAID DC051 212 FTE
STATE-SIZE Miller and Long DC 211 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2576-83250000-8325 215 FTE
STATE-SIZE Museum of the Bible (MOTB) 211 FTE
CITY-NEAR Children's National Medical Center 7,153 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Washington Hospital Center 7,073 FTE
CITY-NEAR Medstar Georgetown University Hospital 4,771 FTE
CITY-NEAR Customs and Border Protection - Headquarters 3,601 FTE
NAT-TCR Central Paving Co., Inc. 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Salem Place Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Allura - White City 3.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Wapello Specialty Care 3.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Thatcher Unified School District No. 4 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Alameda Healthcare & Wellness Center 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Swissotel Chicago Employment Services L.L.C. 213 FTE
NAT-SIZE Linc 0462 (Hammond - F) 213 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.