Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Georgia

The Sheridan at Eastside

Snellville, GA · ~90 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Sheridan at Eastside runs at 254% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Sheridan at Eastside: 9.7 TCR = 254% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Sheridan at Eastside safety composite

The Sheridan at Eastside scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

33/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.66 per 100 workers

Safer than 32% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.23 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Sheridan at Eastside: 0.0 → 8.2 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 20.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.85× in 2024

The Sheridan at Eastside's TCR rose 8.2 from 0.0 in 2019 to 8.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 20.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.85× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Snellville, GA ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.7 · 254% of ind

  • DART 8.2 DART
  • RANK #56/77
  • PHOTO The Springs at Willo…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~90 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Springs at Willowcreek (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

The Sheridan at Eastside in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Sheridan at Eastside averages 9.7 TCR (254% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Sheridan at Eastside TCR series: 2019=0 · 2020=10.3 · 2022=20.2 · 2023=9.6 · 2024=8.2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Sheridan at Eastside falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 32% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 77 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Georgia.

The Sheridan at Eastside (90 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Sheridan at Eastside
The Sheridan at Eastside (90 employees, TCR 9.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Sheridan at Eastside has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.2 8.2 3 4 0
2023 9.6 7.2 8 0 0
2022 20.2 17.6 6 18 0
2020 10.3 0.0 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · GA · Snellville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 55 employers in Snellville, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Springs at Willowcreek 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Wellshire Morton Grove 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Senior Housing, LLC 9.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR 6443-512205 9.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Structor Group, Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE MetroPower Inc BR 2, 8 & 85 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Safe Aire Heating and Cooling Company, Inc. 90 FTE
STATE-SIZE Daybreak Industrial Inc 90 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eastside Medical Center 1,226 FTE
CITY-NEAR Piedmont Eastside Medical Center 1,054 FTE
CITY-NEAR E.R. Snell Contractor, Inc. 854 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3389 364 FTE
NAT-TCR Hope House 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 8004 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Eddy Senior Care-PACE-Latham 9.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 1238 - Irvine North 9.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Revere Electric Supply Hartland 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sanilac Intermediate School District 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Maricopa County - Parks and Recreation (300) 90 FTE
NAT-SIZE Opal-Foods School Farm 90 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.