Continuing care retirement communities · Oregon

The Springs at Clackamas Woods

Milwaukie, OR · ~134 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
4.4
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Springs at Clackamas Woods runs at 117% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade C.

The Springs at Clackamas Woods: 4.4 TCR = 117% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Springs at Clackamas Woods safety composite

The Springs at Clackamas Woods scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 74% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

67/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.43 per 100 workers

Safer than 74% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0.99 per 100 workers

Safer than 71% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−5.1

2016→2024

The Springs at Clackamas Woods injury rate improved

The Springs at Clackamas Woods's TCR fell 5.1 from 9.0 in 2016 to 4.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 9.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.22× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=9.0 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=3.0 · 2021=0.0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=4.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Milwaukie, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade C · TCR 4.4 · 117% of ind

  • DART 1.0 DART
  • RANK #23/92
  • PHOTO Cottingham Retiremen…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~134 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cottingham Retirement Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

The Springs at Clackamas Woods in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Springs at Clackamas Woods averages 4.4 TCR (117% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Springs at Clackamas Woods TCR series: 2016=9 · 2017=3.8 · 2018=9.7 · 2019=6.1 · 2020=3 · 2021=0 · 2022=2.2 · 2023=2.2 · 2024=4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Springs at Clackamas Woods falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 74% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #23 safest of 92 Continuing care retirement com employers in Oregon.

The Springs at Clackamas Woods (134 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Springs at Clackamas Woods
The Springs at Clackamas Woods (134 employees, TCR 4.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Springs at Clackamas Woods has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.0 1.0 4 0 0
2023 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2022 2.2 1.1 2 0 0
2021 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2020 3.0 3.0 3 0 0
2019 6.1 3.0 6 0 0
2018 9.7 6.8 10 0 0
2017 3.8 1.9 4 0 0
2016 9.0 7.0 8 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OR · Milwaukie

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 79 employers in Milwaukie, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cottingham Retirement Community 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Claiborne At West Lake 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brethren Village 4.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Harbour's Edge 4.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Tualatin Valley Water District 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Fred Shearer and Sons 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Packaging Resources Company Tualatin 134 FTE
STATE-SIZE Western Shelter Services 134 FTE
CITY-NEAR OR345 PROVIDENCE MILWAUKIE HOSPITAL-MILWAUKIE 652 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2252-00000550 614 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bob's Red Mill Natural Foods 591 FTE
CITY-NEAR SUPERVALU DISTRIBUTION CENTER - PORTLAND 34011 467 FTE
NAT-TCR Bolger Brothers, Inc. 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR IKEA #026 Canton 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR The Fresh Market 170 4.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Fresh Mark Salem 4.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Pawling EP 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE UFP Ranson, LLC 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE NWA Nursing Center, LLC dba The Maples at Har-Ber Meadows 134 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nursing Care Facility 134 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.