Continuing care retirement communities · Oregon

The Springs at Greer Gardens

Eugene, OR · ~148 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Springs at Greer Gardens runs at 314% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Springs at Greer Gardens: 11.9 TCR = 314% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Springs at Greer Gardens safety composite

The Springs at Greer Gardens scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 12%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 21% of industry peers

DART rate
F 11.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 12% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Springs at Greer Gardens: 5.6 → 20.8 TCR

Peak year 2024 @ 20.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.94× in 2024

The Springs at Greer Gardens's TCR rose 15.2 from 5.6 in 2017 to 20.8 in 2024. In 2024, DART was 0.94× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Eugene, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.9 · 314% of ind

  • DART 11.2 DART
  • RANK #76/92
  • PHOTO The Meth-Wick Commun…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 107 inj
  • SIZE ~148 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Meth-Wick Community (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

The Springs at Greer Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Springs at Greer Gardens averages 11.9 TCR (314% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Springs at Greer Gardens TCR series: 2017=5.6 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=16.5 · 2020=13.1 · 2021=5.4 · 2022=8.1 · 2023=13.2 · 2024=20.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Springs at Greer Gardens falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 21% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #76 safest of 92 Continuing care retirement com employers in Oregon.

The Springs at Greer Gardens (148 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Springs at Greer Gardens
The Springs at Greer Gardens (148 employees, TCR 11.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Springs at Greer Gardens has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 20.8 11.2 26 0 0
2023 13.2 10.5 15 0 0
2022 8.1 4.5 9 0 0
2021 5.4 2.7 4 0 0
2020 13.1 8.7 15 0 0
2019 16.5 12.4 20 0 0
2018 12.6 9.3 15 0 0
2017 5.6 0.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OR · Eugene

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 466 employers in Eugene, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Meth-Wick Community 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Morningside House of Satyr Hill 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Orchard pointe Arrowhead 11.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR United Methodist Communities - Collingswood 11.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE PORTLAND FRENCH LIMITED 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Caddock Electronics, Inc. 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE Leviton 148 FTE
STATE-SIZE SWY-0019-0019-01447 FAC-01447-PORTLAND-OR 148 FTE
CITY-NEAR MATT KNIGHT ARENA 863 FTE
CITY-NEAR Hult Center for the Performing Arts 861 FTE
CITY-NEAR PHMG PHOR Clinics 848 FTE
CITY-NEAR SHMC at University District 564 FTE
NAT-TCR Wentz & Patrick Construction Co., Inc. 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Trader Joe's 0603 Wayne 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Glen Daniel Go-Mart 102 11.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Evans Glass Company 11.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Detroit DC 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE W.E. O'Neil Construction Company 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mack Industries Inc 148 FTE
NAT-SIZE Giaquinto Masonry 148 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.