Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Oregon

The Springs at Lancaster Village

Salem, OR · ~100 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.0
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Springs at Lancaster Village runs at 236% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Springs at Lancaster Village: 9.0 TCR = 236% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Springs at Lancaster Village safety composite

The Springs at Lancaster Village scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 20%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

34/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.98 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
F 8.32 per 100 workers

Safer than 20% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.3

2020→2024

The Springs at Lancaster Village injury rate improved

The Springs at Lancaster Village's TCR fell 7.3 from 15.6 in 2020 to 8.3 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 15.6 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.93× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=15.6 · 2021=14.2 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=8.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Salem, OR ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 236% of ind

  • DART 8.3 DART
  • RANK #56/92
  • PHOTO Cornerstone Village …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~100 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Cornerstone Village North - Sherwood (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

The Springs at Lancaster Village in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Springs at Lancaster Village averages 9.0 TCR (236% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Springs at Lancaster Village TCR series: 2020=15.6 · 2021=14.2 · 2022=2.7 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=8.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Springs at Lancaster Village falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #56 safest of 92 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Oregon.

The Springs at Lancaster Village (100 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Springs at Lancaster Village
The Springs at Lancaster Village (100 employees, TCR 9.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Springs at Lancaster Village has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.3 8.3 7 0 0
2023 4.1 2.7 3 0 0
2022 2.7 2.7 2 0 0
2021 14.2 9.5 5 1 0
2020 15.6 15.6 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OR · Salem

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Cornerstone Village North - Sherwood 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Brookdale Valparaiso MC (IN) 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Touchmark at All Saints LLC 9.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR North Oaks Partnership 9.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL OFFICE 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hermiston 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Laird Superfood Inc 100 FTE
STATE-SIZE Interfor US 100 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR Arbor Care Centers - Valhaven 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Turf Star, Inc.- Rancho Cordova 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 0968 - Bird Road 9.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Store 1618 9.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Casella Recycling Auburn 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Code Electric, Inc. 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE Semco LLC 100 FTE
NAT-SIZE KW International Inc. (2800-Irving-TX) 100 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.