Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard · Tennessee

The Tranzonic Companies

Knoxville, TN · ~193 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Tranzonic Companies runs at 249% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard workplace, earning a grade F.

The Tranzonic Companies: 8.2 TCR = 249% of Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS 3.3 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Tranzonic Companies safety composite

The Tranzonic Companies scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 8%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

22/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 8.21 per 100 workers

Safer than 8% of industry peers

DART rate
F 4.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.5

2018→2023

The Tranzonic Companies injury rate improved

The Tranzonic Companies's TCR fell 7.5 from 11.8 in 2018 to 4.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 11.8 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.53× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2018=11.8 · 2019=8.4 · 2023=4.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 322299 · Knoxville, TN ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 249% of ind

  • DART 4.4 DART
  • RANK #8/8
  • PHOTO Wilkes-Barre
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 46 inj
  • SIZE ~193 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Wilkes-Barre (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Tennessee employers → · Look up another →

The Tranzonic Companies in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Tranzonic Companies averages 8.2 TCR (249% of the Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Tranzonic Companies TCR series: 2018=11.8 · 2019=8.4 · 2023=4.4 · BLS 3.3

Where The Tranzonic Companies falls in its industry

236 Paper products (except office establishments

Safer than 8% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Tennessee alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #8 safest of 8 Paper products (except office employers in Tennessee.

The Tranzonic Companies (193 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Tranzonic Companies
The Tranzonic Companies (193 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 62 employees and a TCR of 3.2

The Tranzonic Companies has more employees than the Paper products (except office supply), d median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 4.4 4.4 10 0 0
2019 8.4 3.9 14 1 0
2018 11.8 10.3 22 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

322299 · TN · Knoxville

236 Paper products (except office supply), die-cut, made from purchased paper or paperboard employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,743 rated employers in Tennessee with headcount on file · 747 employers in Knoxville, TN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Wilkes-Barre 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR NCC Northlake 8.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gusmer Enterprises, Inc. - Hickory, NC 8.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Pellet America Corporation Appleton 8.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE STONEPEAK CERAMICS, INC. 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE TN Tennessee, LLC 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Portland Facility 193 FTE
STATE-SIZE Hydro-Gear, Huntingdon 193 FTE
CITY-NEAR Cellular Sales Services Group LLC 6,387 FTE
CITY-NEAR University Health System, Inc 5,215 FTE
CITY-NEAR Functional Pathways of TN LLC 2,258 FTE
CITY-NEAR HES Facilities Services K-12 2,157 FTE
NAT-TCR XEN 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR The Pines 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR PF TNC SNF Ops, LLC 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Dexter Stamping Company, LLC 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Tecumseh tupelo 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Lourdes Care-Cherry Hill 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Geisinger Medical Center Annex Building 193 FTE
NAT-SIZE Zatarain's 193 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2019, 2018. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.