Retirement communities, continuing care · California

The Village at Sherman Oaks

Sherman Oaks, CA · ~125 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
16.3
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Village at Sherman Oaks runs at 428% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Village at Sherman Oaks: 16.3 TCR = 428% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Village at Sherman Oaks safety composite

The Village at Sherman Oaks scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

21/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 16.26 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.5

2017→2024

The Village at Sherman Oaks injury rate improved

The Village at Sherman Oaks's TCR fell 2.5 from 16.4 in 2017 to 13.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 29.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.76× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=16.4 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=25.0 · 2021=29.5 · 2022=16.1 · 2023=13.2 · 2024=13.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Sherman Oaks, CA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 16.3 · 428% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #185/216
  • PHOTO Blue Ridge Senior Ho…
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 69 inj
  • SIZE ~125 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Blue Ridge Senior Housing, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →

The Village at Sherman Oaks in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Village at Sherman Oaks averages 16.3 TCR (428% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Village at Sherman Oaks TCR series: 2017=16.4 · 2018=2.9 · 2019=13.2 · 2020=25 · 2021=29.5 · 2022=16.1 · 2023=13.2 · 2024=13.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Village at Sherman Oaks falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #185 safest of 216 Retirement communities, contin employers in California.

The Village at Sherman Oaks (125 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate The Village at Sherman Oaks
The Village at Sherman Oaks (125 employees, TCR 16.3) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Village at Sherman Oaks has more employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.9 12.4 9 0 0
2023 13.2 13.2 10 5 0
2022 16.1 13.1 11 5 0
2021 29.5 28.4 9 20 0
2020 25.0 22.1 5 21 0
2019 13.2 4.4 10 2 0
2018 2.9 1.9 3 0 0
2017 16.4 16.4 12 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · CA · Sherman Oaks

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 47 employers in Sherman Oaks, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Blue Ridge Senior Housing, LLC 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Wabash 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Midland Retirement LLC dba Primrose of Midland 16.3 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellhaven Senior Apartments 16.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE Maywood Farms 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bowland Vineyard Management, Inc. 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Ventura Pacific 125 FTE
STATE-SIZE Heritage Farms LLC 125 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sherman Oaks Fashion Square 501 500 FTE
CITY-NEAR IMT Residential 464 FTE
CITY-NEAR 71501 290 FTE
CITY-NEAR 72029 243 FTE
NAT-TCR City of Alton, IL - Public Works 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Metal-Tech Industrial, LLC 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR Suzanne Elise assisted living 16.3 TCR
NAT-TCR North Fork Builders' of Montana, Inc. 16.3 TCR
NAT-SIZE Berlin Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE DeMaria 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE JW Marriott Atlanta Buckhead 125 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fargo Location 125 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.