Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

The Village at Shrewsbury

Shrewsbury, PA · ~171 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Village at Shrewsbury runs at 235% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Village at Shrewsbury: 8.9 TCR = 235% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Village at Shrewsbury safety composite

The Village at Shrewsbury scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 36%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

58/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 36% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.4

2016→2024

The Village at Shrewsbury injury rate improved

The Village at Shrewsbury's TCR fell 3.4 from 3.4 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 30.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=3.4 · 2017=8.0 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=12.0 · 2020=30.2 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Shrewsbury, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 8.9 · 235% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #160/257
  • PHOTO The Forum at Overlan…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 76 inj
  • SIZE ~171 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Forum at Overland Park (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Village at Shrewsbury in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Village at Shrewsbury averages 8.9 TCR (235% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Village at Shrewsbury TCR series: 2016=3.4 · 2017=8 · 2018=14.1 · 2019=12 · 2020=30.2 · 2021=8.6 · 2022=3.9 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Village at Shrewsbury falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 36% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #160 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

The Village at Shrewsbury (171 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Village at Shrewsbury
The Village at Shrewsbury (171 employees, TCR 8.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Village at Shrewsbury has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 3.9 2.6 3 0 0
2021 8.6 5.7 9 0 0
2020 30.2 27.8 11 27 0
2019 12.0 10.6 17 0 0
2018 14.1 12.7 20 0 0
2017 8.0 7.3 11 0 0
2016 3.4 2.7 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · Shrewsbury

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 8 employers in Shrewsbury, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Forum at Overland Park 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Woods of South Elgin 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Touchmark in the West Hills LLC 8.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Lakewell Place 8.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Homer City Generating Station 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE TIS PA Morrisville 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE The Farfield Company 171 FTE
STATE-SIZE Susquehanna Nuclear Plant 171 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2519 351 FTE
CITY-NEAR 2519 330 FTE
CITY-NEAR 106271 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR GIANT FOOD STORES 6271 192 FTE
NAT-TCR Builders - Kearney 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR El Super 8 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Packing Plant 8.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Greater Atlanta Region 8.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Bsc - 9011 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Jacksonville Factory 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Silgan Containers Ft Madison 171 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pink Jeep Sedona 171 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.