Continuing care retirement communities · Pennsylvania

The Village at Sprenkle Drive

York, PA · ~197 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Village at Sprenkle Drive runs at 305% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Village at Sprenkle Drive: 11.6 TCR = 305% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Village at Sprenkle Drive safety composite

The Village at Sprenkle Drive scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 63% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

44/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.58 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.11 per 100 workers

Safer than 63% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.5

2016→2024

The Village at Sprenkle Drive injury rate improved

The Village at Sprenkle Drive's TCR fell 4.5 from 8.7 in 2016 to 4.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 19.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=8.7 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=14.0 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=19.7 · 2021=17.9 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=4.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · York, PA ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 305% of ind

  • DART 2.1 DART
  • RANK #200/257
  • PHOTO Christian Retirement…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 123 inj
  • SIZE ~197 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Christian Retirement Services Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Pennsylvania employers → · Look up another →

The Village at Sprenkle Drive in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Village at Sprenkle Drive averages 11.6 TCR (305% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Village at Sprenkle Drive TCR series: 2016=8.7 · 2017=9.8 · 2018=14 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=19.7 · 2021=17.9 · 2022=10.4 · 2023=9.3 · 2024=4.2 · BLS 3.8

Where The Village at Sprenkle Drive falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Pennsylvania alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #200 safest of 257 Continuing care retirement com employers in Pennsylvania.

The Village at Sprenkle Drive (197 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Village at Sprenkle Drive
The Village at Sprenkle Drive (197 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Village at Sprenkle Drive has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.2 2.1 6 0 0
2023 9.3 6.7 14 0 0
2022 10.4 9.3 10 0 0
2021 17.9 16.9 14 5 0
2020 19.7 18.1 14 10 0
2019 10.1 8.8 15 0 0
2018 14.0 12.1 22 0 0
2017 9.8 8.5 15 0 0
2016 8.7 6.7 13 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · PA · York

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,692 rated employers in Pennsylvania with headcount on file · 496 employers in York, PA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Christian Retirement Services Inc. 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Highland Senior Living 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Primrose of Washington 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Emery Place 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE Holyoke Massachusetts 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Knouse Foods Coop, Inc - Chambersburg 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE North American Packaging LLC. dba Econo-Pak 197 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rehrig Pacific Company Erie 197 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan York Hospital 4,886 FTE
CITY-NEAR WellSpan Medical Group 4,293 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wellspan Health 2,591 FTE
CITY-NEAR FedEx Supply Chain (Target York) 1,875 FTE
NAT-TCR Wilmington De 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR At Home Stores #134 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Lincolnton Rehabilitation Center 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Washington DC HVC 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE RP Weddell & Sons 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE ihc construction companies llc 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE St. Charles 197 FTE
NAT-SIZE 001-DAY 197 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.