Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) · Ohio

The Village Network

Wooster, OH · ~383 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.7
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Village Network runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) workplace, earning a grade D.

The Village Network: 4.7 TCR = 123% of Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Village Network safety composite

The Village Network scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 64% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 47%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

55/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 4.68 per 100 workers

Safer than 64% of industry peers

DART rate
D 3.38 per 100 workers

Safer than 47% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2022

The Village Network injury rate improved

The Village Network's TCR fell 2.0 from 5.4 in 2016 to 3.4 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.1 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=5.4 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=3.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623990 · Wooster, OH ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.7 · 123% of ind

  • DART 3.4 DART
  • RANK #7/13
  • PHOTO The Angelus, Inc
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 88 inj
  • SIZE ~383 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Angelus, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Ohio employers → · Look up another →

The Village Network in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Village Network averages 4.7 TCR (123% of the Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Village Network TCR series: 2016=5.4 · 2018=6.1 · 2019=4.8 · 2020=3.7 · 2022=3.4 · BLS 3.8

Where The Village Network falls in its industry

560 Boys' and girls' residential f establishments

Safer than 64% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Ohio alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 13 Boys' and girls' residential f employers in Ohio.

The Village Network (383 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Village Network
The Village Network (383 employees, TCR 4.7) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 64 employees and a TCR of 6.4

The Village Network has more employees than the Boys' and girls' residential facilities median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 3.4 3.4 13 0 0
2020 3.7 3.2 13 2 0
2019 4.8 3.5 19 0 0
2018 6.1 5.0 24 0 0
2016 5.4 5.4 19 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623990 · OH · Wooster

560 Boys' and girls' residential facilities (e.g., homes, ranches, villages) employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 22,650 rated employers in Ohio with headcount on file · 133 employers in Wooster, OH · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Angelus, Inc 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR Colonial Hall Manor, INC. 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR SOBEOR-INC-SOUTH BEND,IN - INDIANA 4.7 TCR
NAICS-TCR White's Residential and Family Services 4.7 TCR
STATE-SIZE Worthington Cylinders Columbus 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE Gold Medal Products - Cincinnati 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cincinnati Incorporated 383 FTE
STATE-SIZE Kichler - Cleveland 383 FTE
CITY-NEAR Scaheffler Transmissions LLC 1,907 FTE
CITY-NEAR LuK USA LLC 1,814 FTE
CITY-NEAR Schaeffler Transmission LLC 1,662 FTE
CITY-NEAR College of Wooster 771 FTE
NAT-TCR Grov Technologies LLC 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR Joint Council for Economic Opportunity of Clinton & Franklin Counties, Inc. 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 021 Sdg 4.7 TCR
NAT-TCR 054/Hallendae Beach 4.7 TCR
NAT-SIZE Mainstay Life Services 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE CO Employee Services Center 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE GSI : Assumption 383 FTE
NAT-SIZE San Diego - CA 383 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.