Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Indiana

The Waterford at Edison Lakes

Mishawaka, IN · ~52 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
7.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waterford at Edison Lakes runs at 187% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Waterford at Edison Lakes: 7.1 TCR = 187% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waterford at Edison Lakes safety composite

The Waterford at Edison Lakes scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 87% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 48%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

62/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.1 per 100 workers

Safer than 48% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 87% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−4.6

2016→2020

The Waterford at Edison Lakes injury rate improved

The Waterford at Edison Lakes's TCR fell 4.6 from 16.4 in 2016 to 11.8 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2016 at 16.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=16.4 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=0.0 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=11.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Mishawaka, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 7.1 · 187% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #78/136
  • PHOTO Beckley Health Partn…
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 9 inj
  • SIZE ~52 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Beckley Health Partners (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

The Waterford at Edison Lakes in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waterford at Edison Lakes averages 7.1 TCR (187% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waterford at Edison Lakes TCR series: 2016=16.4 · 2017=7.3 · 2018=0 · 2019=0 · 2020=11.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Waterford at Edison Lakes falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 48% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #78 safest of 136 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Indiana.

The Waterford at Edison Lakes (52 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waterford at Edison Lakes
The Waterford at Edison Lakes (52 employees, TCR 7.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Waterford at Edison Lakes has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 11.8 0.0 4 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2018 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 7.3 0.0 2 0 0
2016 16.4 4.1 3 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · IN · Mishawaka

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 185 employers in Mishawaka, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Beckley Health Partners 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Sunny View 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Bickford of Presque Isle Bay 7.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Rockridge 7.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Taconic Biosciences, Inc. Cambridge City Facility 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2527-Windfall, IN (Monsanto Co.) 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE LeMaster Steel Erectors Inc. - Elkhart 52 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pioneer Oil Company Inc 52 FTE
CITY-NEAR Saint Joseph Regional Medical Center Mishawaka 1,906 FTE
CITY-NEAR AM General, LLC 459 FTE
CITY-NEAR LCI - 039 392 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 2678 381 FTE
NAT-TCR Gateway Villa and Gateway Gardens 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Bickford of Presque Isle Bay 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Roses 402 7.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 1855-MIDET427 7.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Dallas Branch 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Anchor Fire Protection Company 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE Crown Manufacturing 52 FTE
NAT-SIZE SCS II, AJV DC Regional Grounds 52 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.