Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · Wisconsin

The Waterford at Fitchburg

Fitchburg, WI · ~32 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Waterford at Fitchburg runs at 153% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade D.

The Waterford at Fitchburg: 5.8 TCR = 153% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Waterford at Fitchburg safety composite

The Waterford at Fitchburg scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 84% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 50%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

66/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
C 5.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 61% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−7.9

2017→2024

The Waterford at Fitchburg injury rate improved

The Waterford at Fitchburg's TCR fell 7.9 from 7.9 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 11.8 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=7.9 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Fitchburg, WI ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade D · TCR 5.8 · 153% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #126/273
  • PHOTO Timberhill Plae
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 10 inj
  • SIZE ~32 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Timberhill Plae (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

The Waterford at Fitchburg in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Waterford at Fitchburg averages 5.8 TCR (153% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Waterford at Fitchburg TCR series: 2017=7.9 · 2018=5.1 · 2019=11.5 · 2020=11.8 · 2021=4.4 · 2022=0 · 2023=5.8 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.8

Where The Waterford at Fitchburg falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 61% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #126 safest of 273 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Wisconsin.

The Waterford at Fitchburg (32 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Waterford at Fitchburg
The Waterford at Fitchburg (32 employees, TCR 5.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The Waterford at Fitchburg has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 5.8 5.8 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 4.4 0.0 1 0 0
2020 11.8 11.8 3 0 0
2019 11.5 7.7 3 0 0
2018 5.1 5.1 1 0 0
2017 7.9 7.9 1 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · WI · Fitchburg

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 26 employers in Fitchburg, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Timberhill Plae 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Beachwood Commons by New Perspective 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR 10 Wilmington Place 5.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR HarborChase of Prince William Commons 5.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Al's Apples Inc 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2404-De Forest, WI (Monsanto Co.) 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Mackville 32 FTE
STATE-SIZE Construction - Sub & Trans 32 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sub-Zero Built In 1,057 FTE
CITY-NEAR Wolf Appliance 1,006 FTE
CITY-NEAR Sub-Zero Built-In 699 FTE
CITY-NEAR Certco Inc 543 FTE
NAT-TCR Asbury Towers Retirement Community 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Sodexo at Lansing School District 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR The Renaissance 5.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Littorai Wines 5.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Ingram Readymix, Inc.-Sa4 #22 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Atkinson's Mirror & Glass 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Bluebell Place Builders 32 FTE
NAT-SIZE Major Builders, Inc. 32 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.