Continuing care retirement communities · California
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens
Livermore, CA · ~54 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.
- F
- Failing Safety Record
- 9.0
- Avg TCR
- 3.8
- Industry avg
- 0
- Fatalities
The verdict
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens runs at 238% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens: 9.0 TCR = 238% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens safety composite
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 68% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).
51/100
Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures
- Total Case Rate (TCR)
- D 9.03 per 100 workers
Safer than 35% of industry peers
- DART rate
- C 1.53 per 100 workers
Safer than 68% of industry peers
- Fatalities
- D 0
Safer than 51% of industry peers
Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).
TCR Δ
−5.1
2016→2024
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens injury rate improved
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens's TCR fell 5.1 from 6.7 in 2016 to 1.5 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2020 at 32.9 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.17× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).
2016=6.7 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=13.2 · 2019=10.9 · 2020=32.9 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.5
OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard
Establishment book 623311 · Livermore, CA ABOVE-IND · SMALL
Grade F · TCR 9.0 · 238% of ind
- DART 1.5 DART
- RANK #103/216
- PHOTO Park Place of Elmhurst
- BOOK 9y book
- INJ 33 inj
- SIZE ~54 FTE
Nearest TCR peer: Park Place of Elmhurst (0.0 TCR gap)
Read with this employer → · Industry book → · California employers → · Look up another →
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens in the TCR neighbourhood
Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers
- This site
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens
9 TCR
- Park Place of
Park Place of Elmhurst
9 TCR
- Belmont Villag
Belmont Village St. Matthews
9 TCR
- The Grove Assi
The Grove Assisted Living
9 TCR
- Azalea Estates
Azalea Estates of Gonzales
9 TCR
What this shows The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens averages 9.0 TCR (238% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens TCR series: 2016=6.7 · 2017=0.1 · 2018=13.2 · 2019=10.9 · 2020=32.9 · 2021=1.9 · 2022=10.5 · 2023=3.5 · 2024=1.5 · BLS 3.8
Where The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens falls in its industry
4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishmentsSafer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.
Narrower to California alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #103 safest of 216 Continuing care retirement com employers in California.
The Watermark at Rosewood Gardens has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.
Year-by-Year Safety Data
| Year | TCR | DART | Injuries | Illnesses | Fatalities |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 10.5 | 5.3 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 1.9 | 1.9 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 32.9 | 30.1 | 5 | 18 | 0 |
| 2019 | 10.9 | 10.9 | 7 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 13.2 | 5.0 | 4 | 4 | 0 |
| 2017 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6.7 | 5.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
OSHA ITA peer cross-reference
Establishment peer ledger
623311 · CA · Livermore
4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 51,834 rated employers in California with headcount on file · 296 employers in Livermore, CA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.
| Rel | Establishment | Metric |
|---|---|---|
| NAICS-TCR | Park Place of Elmhurst | 9.0 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Belmont Village St. Matthews | 9.0 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | The Grove Assisted Living | 9.0 TCR |
| NAICS-TCR | Azalea Estates of Gonzales | 9.0 TCR |
| STATE-SIZE | Sea Mist Farms | 54 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Harold E. Robben, Jr. | 54 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Jose Maria Perez | 54 FTE |
| STATE-SIZE | Pauma Valley | 54 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Retail Merchandising Solutions, LLC | 4,717 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | California Department of Transportation Facility 577 | 2,891 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Gillig LLC | 940 FTE |
| CITY-NEAR | Fat Chance Entertainment | 917 FTE |
| NAT-TCR | Academy Roofing Inc. | 9.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | St Charles Health Campus | 9.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | Park Place of Elmhurst | 9.0 TCR |
| NAT-TCR | 072/King of Prussia | 9.0 TCR |
| NAT-SIZE | Marine Pollution Control (MPC) | 54 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Metal Textiles Corporation | 54 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Vecellio Management Services | 54 FTE |
| NAT-SIZE | Sanders-Nursing Home 5453 | 54 FTE |
Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →
Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.