Retirement communities, continuing care · Florida

The Watermark at Vistawilla

Winter Springs, FL · ~60 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
8.2
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Watermark at Vistawilla runs at 216% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Retirement communities, continuing care workplace, earning a grade F.

The Watermark at Vistawilla: 8.2 TCR = 216% of Retirement communities, continuing care BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Watermark at Vistawilla safety composite

The Watermark at Vistawilla scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 37%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

42/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 8.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 40% of industry peers

DART rate
D 4.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 37% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Watermark at Vistawilla: 0.0 → 4.9 TCR

Peak year 2019 @ 27.2 TCR · DART/TCR 0.6× in 2024

The Watermark at Vistawilla's TCR rose 4.9 from 0.0 in 2017 to 4.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 27.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.6× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Winter Springs, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 8.2 · 216% of ind

  • DART 4.9 DART
  • RANK #171/283
  • PHOTO Primrose of Midland
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~60 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Primrose of Midland (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The Watermark at Vistawilla in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Watermark at Vistawilla averages 8.2 TCR (216% of the Retirement communities, continuing care BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Watermark at Vistawilla TCR series: 2017=0 · 2018=4.8 · 2019=27.2 · 2020=7 · 2021=0.7 · 2022=12.2 · 2023=8.9 · 2024=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The Watermark at Vistawilla falls in its industry

4,127 Retirement communities, contin establishments

Safer than 40% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #171 safest of 283 Retirement communities, contin employers in Florida.

The Watermark at Vistawilla (60 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Watermark at Vistawilla
The Watermark at Vistawilla (60 employees, TCR 8.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Watermark at Vistawilla has fewer employees than the Retirement communities, continuing care median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 4.9 4.9 3 0 0
2023 8.9 5.3 5 0 0
2022 12.2 6.1 5 1 0
2021 0.7 0.7 1 0 0
2020 7.0 2.3 3 0 0
2019 27.2 17.3 11 0 0
2018 4.8 4.8 1 0 0
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Winter Springs

4,127 Retirement communities, continuing care employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 33 employers in Winter Springs, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Primrose of Midland 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR MOOREHEAD PLACE 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Village On The Isle 8.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Toby Weinman Assisted Living Residence 8.2 TCR
STATE-SIZE Bartow Combined Cycle Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE PCC-Cape Canaveral Plant 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE BB1 Boynton Beach - S C Strm 60 FTE
STATE-SIZE Southern Customer Service 60 FTE
CITY-NEAR Valor Environmental of GA, Inc. 256 FTE
CITY-NEAR Catholic Heart Work Camp LLC 222 FTE
CITY-NEAR Store 0796 208 FTE
CITY-NEAR Alpha EMC 202 FTE
NAT-TCR US Weight Inc 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Rock Hill Trucking Co., Inc. 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Minneota Elementary 8.2 TCR
NAT-TCR 012 - Chapel Hill 7th 8th Grade Center 8.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Valencia Water Reclamation Plant 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Rich Meier's Landscaping Inc 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE Valley Power Plant 60 FTE
NAT-SIZE 1070 El Paso 60 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.