Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities · South Carolina

The willows of Easley

Easley, SC · ~48 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
11.6
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The willows of Easley runs at 306% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The willows of Easley: 11.6 TCR = 306% of Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS 3.8 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The willows of Easley safety composite

The willows of Easley scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 11.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2020→2024

The willows of Easley injury rate improved

The willows of Easley's TCR fell 1.1 from 14.1 in 2020 to 12.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 14.2 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.56× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2020=14.1 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=14.2 · 2024=12.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623312 · Easley, SC ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 11.6 · 306% of ind

  • DART 6.5 DART
  • RANK #81/107
  • PHOTO Isle at Raider Ranch
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 14 inj
  • SIZE ~48 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Isle at Raider Ranch (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · South Carolina employers → · Look up another →

The willows of Easley in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The willows of Easley averages 11.6 TCR (306% of the Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The willows of Easley TCR series: 2020=14.1 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=8.5 · 2023=14.2 · 2024=12.9 · BLS 3.8

Where The willows of Easley falls in its industry

6,510 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 23% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 7.2.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to South Carolina alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #81 safest of 107 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in South Carolina.

The willows of Easley (48 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The willows of Easley
The willows of Easley (48 employees, TCR 11.6) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 49 employees and a TCR of 7.2

The willows of Easley has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities without on-si median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 7.2. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 12.9 6.5 2 2 0
2023 14.2 4.7 3 0 0
2022 8.5 2.8 3 0 0
2021 8.3 4.2 1 1 0
2020 14.1 2.8 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623312 · SC · Easley

6,510 Assisted-living facilities without on-site nursing care facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,610 rated employers in South Carolina with headcount on file · 56 employers in Easley, SC · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Isle at Raider Ranch 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commonwealth Senior Living at Chesterfield 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Redstone Park Assisted Living 11.6 TCR
NAICS-TCR Palm Bay Memory Care 11.6 TCR
STATE-SIZE BEAUFORT DISTRICT OFFICE 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Palmetto Sitework Services, LLC 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE HUNTER SPECIALTIES, INC. 48 FTE
STATE-SIZE Carolina Pole, Inc. 48 FTE
CITY-NEAR PRISMA HEALTH BAPTIST EASLEY MEDICAL CAMPUS 570 FTE
CITY-NEAR Yokohama Industries Americas South Carolina, LLC 395 FTE
CITY-NEAR BAPTIST EASLEY MED CAMPUS 386 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 631 319 FTE
NAT-TCR The Clare PropCo 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Boundary Waters Care Center 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR West Point Ford 11.6 TCR
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - DGR6 11.6 TCR
NAT-SIZE Russell School 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Town Village of Audubon Park 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Legend of Colorado Springs 48 FTE
NAT-SIZE Dynamic Systems INC 48 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.