Continuing care retirement communities · Montana

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus

Red Lodge, MT · ~23 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
22.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus runs at 602% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus: 22.9 TCR = 602% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus safety composite

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 2%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 22.88 per 100 workers

Safer than 2% of industry peers

DART rate
F 20.81 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus: 18.0 → 27.8 TCR

Peak year 2020 @ 27.8 TCR · DART/TCR 0.91× in 2020

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus's TCR rose 9.7 from 18.0 in 2019 to 27.8 in 2020. In 2020, DART was 0.91× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Red Lodge, MT ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 22.9 · 602% of ind

  • DART 20.8 DART
  • RANK #24/27
  • PHOTO Gillette Retirement …
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 7 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Gillette Retirement Community LLC dba Primrose of Gillette (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Montana employers → · Look up another →

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus averages 22.9 TCR (602% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus TCR series: 2019=18 · 2020=27.8 · BLS 3.8

Where The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 2% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Montana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #24 safest of 27 Continuing care retirement com employers in Montana.

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus (23 employees, TCR 22.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 0510152025 Average employees Total Case Rate The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus
The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus (23 employees, TCR 22.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Willows - St. Johns United Red Lodge Campus has fewer employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 27.8 20.8 4 0 0
2019 18.0 12.0 3 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · MT · Red Lodge

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,536 rated employers in Montana with headcount on file · 7 employers in Red Lodge, MT · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Gillette Retirement Community LLC dba Primrose of Gillette 22.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Hermantown I 22.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Smith Village 22.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Blake at Panama City Beach 22.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Beaverhead Ranch 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Flying D Ranch 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Havre 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rotherham Construction Inc 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Beartooth Billings Clinic 142 FTE
CITY-NEAR Red Lodge Mountain 130 FTE
CITY-NEAR CARBON COUNTY 77 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ceder Wood Healthcare Communtiy 48 FTE
NAT-TCR Fire Station 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Pinecrest Medical Care Facility 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 230428-Bal-Walbrook Sta 22.9 TCR
NAT-TCR South Sound Express Delivery, LLC 22.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Farmers Cooperative Association - Baxter Springs 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Nortrax Bangor 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE ABE/Allentown 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Havertys Furniture Company 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.