Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Florida

The Windsor of Ortega

Jacksonville, FL · ~79 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.8
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Windsor of Ortega runs at 284% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Windsor of Ortega: 10.8 TCR = 284% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Windsor of Ortega safety composite

The Windsor of Ortega scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 25%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.8 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
F 6.95 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−11.5

2016→2024

The Windsor of Ortega injury rate improved

The Windsor of Ortega's TCR fell 11.5 from 18.5 in 2016 to 7.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2016 at 18.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.64× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=18.5 · 2018=14.7 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=15.9 · 2021=15.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=7.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Jacksonville, FL ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.8 · 284% of ind

  • DART 7.0 DART
  • RANK #225/283
  • PHOTO Park Village AL NP LLC
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 39 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Park Village AL NP LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Florida employers → · Look up another →

The Windsor of Ortega in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Windsor of Ortega averages 10.8 TCR (284% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Windsor of Ortega TCR series: 2016=18.5 · 2018=14.7 · 2019=10.1 · 2020=15.9 · 2021=15.6 · 2022=2.5 · 2023=2.1 · 2024=7 · BLS 3.8

Where The Windsor of Ortega falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Florida alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #225 safest of 283 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Florida.

The Windsor of Ortega (79 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Windsor of Ortega
The Windsor of Ortega (79 employees, TCR 10.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Windsor of Ortega has more employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 7.0 7.0 3 0 0
2023 2.1 2.1 1 0 0
2022 2.5 2.5 1 0 0
2021 15.6 10.4 6 0 0
2020 15.9 15.9 2 6 0
2019 10.1 6.8 6 0 0
2018 14.7 9.8 9 0 0
2016 18.5 18.5 11 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · FL · Jacksonville

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 26,569 rated employers in Florida with headcount on file · 1,776 employers in Jacksonville, FL · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Park Village AL NP LLC 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Inspired Living at Sun City Center 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR Arbor Terrace Peachtree City 10.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR CSL Green Bay LLC dba Brookview Meadows 10.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Wish Farms 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE PSN Plant Sanford 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Englewood Water District 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE RLH Construction 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR UF HEALTH JACKSONVILLE 4,948 FTE
CITY-NEAR Mayo Clinic Jacksonville (Clinic) 4,567 FTE
CITY-NEAR Baptist Health System Jacksonville Baptist Medical Center 4,199 FTE
CITY-NEAR FLJAC - JACKSONVILLE 4,193 FTE
NAT-TCR Pickard Roofing Co., Inc. 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Eagle Crusher Company - Bucyrus 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Atlanta SE - 20 10.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Minden Machine Shop, Inc 10.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE Stuart Egg Farm 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE McCormick Equipment Co., Inc. - Ohio Branch Offices 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Shank Door LLC 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Fred Williams, Inc. 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.