Continuing care retirement communities · Oregon

The Woods at Willowcreek

Salem, OR · ~79 workers · 6 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.1
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

The Woods at Willowcreek runs at 267% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

The Woods at Willowcreek: 10.1 TCR = 267% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 6y Form 300A (see methodology below)

The Woods at Willowcreek safety composite

The Woods at Willowcreek scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 23%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.13 per 100 workers

Safer than 29% of industry peers

DART rate
F 7.31 per 100 workers

Safer than 23% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−0.5

2016→2021

The Woods at Willowcreek injury rate improved

The Woods at Willowcreek's TCR fell 0.5 from 7.8 in 2016 to 7.3 in 2021. Peak filing year was 2020 at 23.3 TCR. In 2021, DART was 0.72× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=10.5 · 2019=8.9 · 2020=23.3 · 2021=7.3

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Salem, OR ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.1 · 267% of ind

  • DART 7.3 DART
  • RANK #67/92
  • PHOTO IP Avanti Lafayette …
  • BOOK 6y book
  • INJ 29 inj
  • SIZE ~79 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: IP Avanti Lafayette OPCO LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Oregon employers → · Look up another →

The Woods at Willowcreek in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows The Woods at Willowcreek averages 10.1 TCR (267% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

The Woods at Willowcreek TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=2.9 · 2018=10.5 · 2019=8.9 · 2020=23.3 · 2021=7.3 · BLS 3.8

Where The Woods at Willowcreek falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 29% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Oregon alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #67 safest of 92 Continuing care retirement com employers in Oregon.

The Woods at Willowcreek (79 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate The Woods at Willowcreek
The Woods at Willowcreek (79 employees, TCR 10.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

The Woods at Willowcreek has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2021 7.3 7.3 4 0 0
2020 23.3 21.8 5 10 0
2019 8.9 5.9 6 0 0
2018 10.5 7.5 7 0 0
2017 2.9 1.5 2 0 0
2016 7.8 6.3 5 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · OR · Salem

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 8,031 rated employers in Oregon with headcount on file · 471 employers in Salem, OR · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR IP Avanti Lafayette OPCO LLC 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Crestwood Manor 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Somerset Assisted Living 10.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Collwood 10.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Roseburg Resources 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Central Electric Cooperative, Inc. 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE SDB, Inc. - Oregon 79 FTE
STATE-SIZE Vigor Industrial Services - Portland 79 FTE
CITY-NEAR Oregon State Hospital-Salem Campus 2,036 FTE
CITY-NEAR North America Fulfillment Centers (FCs) : PDX7 1,559 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chemeketa Community College 1,551 FTE
CITY-NEAR Human Service Building ODHS 1,402 FTE
NAT-TCR 198359-Sha-Indian Creek Br 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR PCS - North Highlands 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Pacific Partners Insulation South (BDI) #899 10.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Titan Talent Development, LLC. 10.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Rose City Manufacturing 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Insulations, LLC. Shreveport Operations 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE Doubletree Cleveland Westlake 79 FTE
NAT-SIZE 417920-Southampton Po 79 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.