Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services · Indiana

Thermo King Midwest Inc

Indianapolis, IN · ~44 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
9.2
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermo King Midwest Inc runs at 439% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade F.

Thermo King Midwest Inc: 9.2 TCR = 439% of Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermo King Midwest Inc safety composite

Thermo King Midwest Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 1%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

15/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 9.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 4% of industry peers

DART rate
F 13.22 per 100 workers

Safer than 1% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.2

2022→2024

Thermo King Midwest Inc injury rate improved

Thermo King Midwest Inc's TCR fell 1.2 from 14.4 in 2022 to 13.2 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2022 at 14.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 1.43× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=14.4 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=13.2

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Indianapolis, IN ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 9.2 · 439% of ind

  • DART 13.2 DART
  • RANK #86/90
  • PHOTO Miner - Woods Cross
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 6 inj
  • SIZE ~44 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Miner - Woods Cross (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Indiana employers → · Look up another →

Thermo King Midwest Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermo King Midwest Inc averages 9.2 TCR (439% of the Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermo King Midwest Inc TCR series: 2022=14.4 · 2023=0 · 2024=13.2 · BLS 2.1

Where Thermo King Midwest Inc falls in its industry

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equ establishments

Safer than 4% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Indiana alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #86 safest of 90 Agricultural machinery and equ employers in Indiana.

Thermo King Midwest Inc (44 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermo King Midwest Inc
Thermo King Midwest Inc (44 employees, TCR 9.2) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Thermo King Midwest Inc has fewer employees than the Agricultural machinery and equipment rep median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 13.2 13.2 2 2 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 14.4 0.0 4 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · IN · Indianapolis

2,560 Agricultural machinery and equipment repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,750 rated employers in Indiana with headcount on file · 2,074 employers in Indianapolis, IN · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Miner - Woods Cross 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Whaley Foodservice-Jacksonville 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marine Repair Services - Norfolk International Terminal 9.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo King Midwest Inc-New Haven 9.3 TCR
STATE-SIZE 2307-Whitestown, IN (Monsanto Co.) 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE RushShelby Energy 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE OCM Engineering, LLC 44 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michels Power Inc-IN-Rolling Prairie 44 FTE
CITY-NEAR Indiana University Health, Inc 7,874 FTE
CITY-NEAR Methodist Hospital 6,862 FTE
CITY-NEAR Eli Lilly - Lilly Corp Center 6,482 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lilly Technology Center 6,472 FTE
NAT-TCR JONDO LTD - Rocklin, CA 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Gas Construction Livonia 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Metro Scrap Metals 9.2 TCR
NAT-TCR Old Towne Orange 9.2 TCR
NAT-SIZE Westlake Epoxy Inc. 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE Liberty Propane 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE GFL Solid Waste Midwest LLC- Green Bay HC 44 FTE
NAT-SIZE TransPak - DIV 182 LOGISTICS 44 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.