Refrigeration units, truck-type, manufacturing · Missouri

Thermo King of Springfield

Springfield, MO · ~39 workers · 8 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thermo King of Springfield runs at 240% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Refrigeration units, truck-type, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade F.

Thermo King of Springfield: 7.9 TCR = 240% of Refrigeration units, truck-type, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 8y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thermo King of Springfield safety composite

Thermo King of Springfield scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 10%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

25/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.92 per 100 workers

Safer than 10% of industry peers

DART rate
F 2.97 per 100 workers

Safer than 25% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.3

2016→2024

Thermo King of Springfield injury rate improved

Thermo King of Springfield's TCR fell 1.3 from 10.2 in 2016 to 8.9 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2019 at 12.7 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.38× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=10.2 · 2017=5.9 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=8.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333415 · Springfield, MO ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 240% of ind

  • DART 3.0 DART
  • RANK #15/18
  • PHOTO Goodman Company
  • BOOK 8y book
  • INJ 21 inj
  • SIZE ~39 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Goodman Company (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Missouri employers → · Look up another →

Thermo King of Springfield in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thermo King of Springfield averages 7.9 TCR (240% of the Refrigeration units, truck-type, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thermo King of Springfield TCR series: 2016=10.2 · 2017=5.9 · 2019=12.7 · 2020=6.3 · 2021=8.3 · 2022=7.5 · 2023=3.6 · 2024=8.9 · BLS 3.3

Where Thermo King of Springfield falls in its industry

461 Refrigeration units, truck-typ establishments

Safer than 10% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.8.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Missouri alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #15 safest of 18 Refrigeration units, truck-typ employers in Missouri.

Thermo King of Springfield (39 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,5002,0002,500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Thermo King of Springfield
Thermo King of Springfield (39 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 164 employees and a TCR of 2.8

Thermo King of Springfield has fewer employees than the Refrigeration units, truck-type, manufac median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.8. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 8.9 3.0 3 0 0
2023 3.6 0.0 2 0 0
2022 7.5 2.5 3 0 0
2021 8.3 2.1 4 0 0
2020 6.3 0.0 2 0 0
2019 12.7 6.3 4 0 0
2017 5.9 0.0 2 0 0
2016 10.2 0.0 1 1 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333415 · MO · Springfield

461 Refrigeration units, truck-type, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 10,075 rated employers in Missouri with headcount on file · 633 employers in Springfield, MO · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Goodman Company 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR TMP Manufacturing Co Inc 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Building 1 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Thermo King Sales & Service/Sanco Equipment/Sanco Services 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Select Genetics MO White Oak 006-0138-WG, WH, WT 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE KCP&L - Cedar Point Training Center 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Radiation Protection 39 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMEREN MISSOURI - Nuclear - Work Management 39 FTE
CITY-NEAR MERCY HOSPITAL SPRINGFIELD 4,885 FTE
CITY-NEAR Prime, Inc. HQ 3,091 FTE
CITY-NEAR Corp 3,052 FTE
CITY-NEAR Bass Pro Corporate 1,888 FTE
NAT-TCR Wild By Nature #203 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Northwest Electric, LLC - Columbus Branch 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Nipro Group 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Redmond HQ 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Waisman Construction Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE C & C Roofing & Supply, Inc. 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Pisgah Insulation & Fireplaces 39 FTE
NAT-SIZE Goodwill Industries, Inc 78th Dodge 39 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.