Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services · Rhode Island

Thielsch Engineering

Cranston, RI · ~165 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
0.5
Avg TCR
2.1
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thielsch Engineering runs at 22% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Thielsch Engineering: 0.5 TCR = 22% of Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS 2.1 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thielsch Engineering safety composite

Thielsch Engineering scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 97% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0.46 per 100 workers

Safer than 97% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 76% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.4

2017→2020

Thielsch Engineering injury rate improved

Thielsch Engineering's TCR fell 1.4 from 1.4 in 2017 to 0.0 in 2020. Peak filing year was 2017 at 1.4 TCR. In 2020, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2017=1.4 · 2019=0.0 · 2020=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 811310 · Cranston, RI AT/BELOW-IND · MID

Grade A · TCR 0.5 · 22% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #1/4
  • PHOTO Sulzer Turbo Service…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~165 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Sulzer Turbo Services Houston, Inc. (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Rhode Island employers → · Look up another →

Thielsch Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thielsch Engineering averages 0.5 TCR (22% of the Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thielsch Engineering TCR series: 2017=1.4 · 2019=0 · 2020=0 · BLS 2.1

Where Thielsch Engineering falls in its industry

2,560 Commercial and industrial mach establishments

Safer than 97% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 2.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Rhode Island alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #1 safest of 4 Commercial and industrial mach employers in Rhode Island.

Thielsch Engineering (165 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 0246810 Average employees Total Case Rate Thielsch Engineering
Thielsch Engineering (165 employees, TCR 0.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 45 employees and a TCR of 2.7

Thielsch Engineering has more employees than the Commercial and industrial machinery repa median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 2.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2020 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2017 1.4 1.4 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

811310 · RI · Cranston

2,560 Commercial and industrial machinery repair and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 1,610 rated employers in Rhode Island with headcount on file · 151 employers in Cranston, RI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Sulzer Turbo Services Houston, Inc. 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR CRANE Nuclear PFT Corp 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Commercial HVAC Americas : SVC-Pacific Northwest Rocky Mountain : SVC-Oregon-USA 0.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Joy Global Surface Mining, Inc. Kilgore 0.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE ChemArt Company 165 FTE
STATE-SIZE Rhodes Technologies 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE 10014 Providence 166 FTE
STATE-SIZE 2532-25320208 164 FTE
CITY-NEAR Taco Cranston 393 FTE
CITY-NEAR Tasca Lincoln Mercury Inc 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR Thielsch Engineering HQ 377 FTE
CITY-NEAR Heritage Healthcare Services Inc. 347 FTE
NAT-TCR Coleman Trumbull BH 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR MPC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Salt Lake City, UT HVAC 0.5 TCR
NAT-TCR HydroChem LLC-DPX 0.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE The Laurels of Coldwater 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Mechanical Systems of Dayton Inc. 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Birchwood 165 FTE
NAT-SIZE Carlyle Place, Navicent Health 165 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2020, 2019, 2017. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.