Continuing care retirement communities · Kentucky

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers

Louisville, KY · ~195 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.9
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers runs at 209% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Continuing care retirement communities workplace, earning a grade F.

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers: 7.9 TCR = 209% of Continuing care retirement communities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers safety composite

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers scores strongest on dart rate (safer than 55% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 42%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

49/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 7.94 per 100 workers

Safer than 42% of industry peers

DART rate
C 2.82 per 100 workers

Safer than 55% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−12.5

2016→2022

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers injury rate improved

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers's TCR fell 12.5 from 17.4 in 2016 to 4.9 in 2022. Peak filing year was 2016 at 17.4 TCR. In 2022, DART was 0.36× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=17.4 · 2017=1.5 · 2022=4.9

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Louisville, KY ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.9 · 209% of ind

  • DART 2.8 DART
  • RANK #25/56
  • PHOTO The Fountains at The…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~195 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Fountains at The Albemarle (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Kentucky employers → · Look up another →

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers averages 7.9 TCR (209% of the Continuing care retirement communities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers TCR series: 2016=17.4 · 2017=1.5 · 2022=4.9 · BLS 3.8

Where Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers falls in its industry

4,127 Continuing care retirement com establishments

Safer than 42% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Kentucky alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #25 safest of 56 Continuing care retirement com employers in Kentucky.

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers (195 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers
Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers (195 employees, TCR 7.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Third and Oak Corp dba Treyton Oak Towers has more employees than the Continuing care retirement communities median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2022 4.9 2.8 7 0 0
2017 1.5 1.5 2 0 0
2016 17.4 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · KY · Louisville

4,127 Continuing care retirement communities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 7,805 rated employers in Kentucky with headcount on file · 1,638 employers in Louisville, KY · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Fountains at The Albemarle 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Mable Rose Estates, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Heritage Hill 8.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Edgewood Mitchell LLC 8.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Advanced Electrical Systems Inc. 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Accumetric LLC DBA Soudal 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Summit Polymers Inc. Plant Six 195 FTE
STATE-SIZE Qualex Manchining LLC 195 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jefferson County Public Schools 18,524 FTE
CITY-NEAR KYGRA - WORLDPORT 11,933 FTE
CITY-NEAR WORLDPORT (KYGRA) 9,667 FTE
CITY-NEAR KTKY TRUCK 8,757 FTE
NAT-TCR Moncon, Inc. 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bellinghman 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1159 - Sioux Falls Sd Whse 7.9 TCR
NAT-TCR 1124 - Wheaton Md Whse 7.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fire Department 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE DMJ Transportation 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE API Basco 195 FTE
NAT-SIZE Phoenix Manufacturing 195 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2022, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.