Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation · New Jersey

Thomas Company Inc

Egg Harbor Twp, NJ · ~210 workers · 4 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
7.8
Avg TCR
2.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thomas Company Inc runs at 278% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation workplace, earning a grade F.

Thomas Company Inc: 7.8 TCR = 278% of Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS 2.8 · 4y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thomas Company Inc safety composite

Thomas Company Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 18%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

32/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 7.79 per 100 workers

Safer than 18% of industry peers

DART rate
D 2.39 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−3.0

2016→2019

Thomas Company Inc injury rate improved

Thomas Company Inc's TCR fell 3.0 from 7.8 in 2016 to 4.8 in 2019. Peak filing year was 2018 at 12.6 TCR. In 2019, DART was 0.31× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=7.8 · 2017=6.0 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=4.8

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 238220 · Egg Harbor Twp, NJ ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade F · TCR 7.8 · 278% of ind

  • DART 2.4 DART
  • RANK #69/84
  • PHOTO Fluid Mechanical, LLC
  • BOOK 4y book
  • INJ 64 inj
  • SIZE ~210 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Fluid Mechanical, LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · New Jersey employers → · Look up another →

Thomas Company Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thomas Company Inc averages 7.8 TCR (278% of the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thomas Company Inc TCR series: 2016=7.8 · 2017=6 · 2018=12.6 · 2019=4.8 · BLS 2.8

Where Thomas Company Inc falls in its industry

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust establishments

Safer than 18% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.3.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to New Jersey alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #69 safest of 84 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust employers in New Jersey.

Thomas Company Inc (210 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate Thomas Company Inc
Thomas Company Inc (210 employees, TCR 7.8) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 60 employees and a TCR of 3.3

Thomas Company Inc has more employees than the Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collectio median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.3. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2019 4.8 2.4 8 0 0
2018 12.6 7.0 27 0 0
2017 6.0 2.5 12 0 0
2016 7.8 4.6 17 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

238220 · NJ · Egg Harbor Twp

5,793 Duct work (e.g., cooling, dust collection, exhaust, heating, ventilation) installation employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 11,201 rated employers in New Jersey with headcount on file · 14 employers in Egg Harbor Twp, NJ · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Fluid Mechanical, LLC 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR RRSC Long Island 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR IERNA's Heating and Cooling 7.8 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Prull Group, Inc. 7.8 TCR
STATE-SIZE Hutchinson Industries 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE Inductotherm Corp. 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE J. Ambrogi Foods 210 FTE
STATE-SIZE #552 Piscataway Shoprite 210 FTE
CITY-NEAR Shop Rite of English Creek 284 FTE
CITY-NEAR EGG HARBOR TTWP 181 FTE
CITY-NEAR 0930 EGG HARBOR 110 FTE
CITY-NEAR New Jersey American Water- Fire Rd. 63 FTE
NAT-TCR 6400-Swy 0027 1436 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Marinemax East, Inc.-Ft 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Indianapolis DC 7.8 TCR
NAT-TCR Edc: Rcrs Tx Arlington Core Office 7.8 TCR
NAT-SIZE IRIS USA, Inc. Mesquite TX 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sika Corporation 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE FedEx Supply Chain - Stryk Plainfield 210 FTE
NAT-SIZE MilliporeSigma - EWING 210 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.