Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing · Georgia

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth

Acworth, GA · ~21 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

B
Good Safety Record
1.9
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth runs at 57% of its industry's injury rate - safer than the typical Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing workplace, earning a grade B.

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth: 1.9 TCR = 57% of Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth safety composite

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 83% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

C

74/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.89 per 100 workers

Safer than 83% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 81% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth held a steady TCR band

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2019 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2021 at 9.5 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2019=0.0 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=0.0 · 2023=0.0 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 327320 · Acworth, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade B · TCR 1.9 · 57% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #7/55
  • PHOTO Daytona Ready Mix
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 2 inj
  • SIZE ~21 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Daytona Ready Mix (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth averages 1.9 TCR (57% of the Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth TCR series: 2019=0 · 2021=9.5 · 2022=0 · 2023=0 · 2024=0 · BLS 3.3

Where Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth falls in its industry

1,316 Ready-mix concrete manufacturi establishments

Safer than 83% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.5.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #7 safest of 55 Ready-mix concrete manufacturi employers in Georgia.

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth (21 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 4.5 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth
Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth (21 employees, TCR 1.9) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 33 employees and a TCR of 4.5

Thomas Concrete of Georgia Acworth has fewer employees than the Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and dis median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.5. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2021 9.5 4.7 2 0 0
2019 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

327320 · GA · Acworth

1,316 Ready-mix concrete manufacturing and distributing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 73 employers in Acworth, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Daytona Ready Mix 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Cantonment 5210 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR Gaines County Harvesters, Inc. 1.9 TCR
NAICS-TCR INGRAM READYMIX, INC.-SEGUIN SHOP #85 1.9 TCR
STATE-SIZE Seven Hills Forestry LLC 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Pilgrim's Pride Commerce Hatchery 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Quality Gin, Inc. 21 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cochran Oil Mill & Ginnery 21 FTE
CITY-NEAR Inalfa Roof Systems - Cherokee Campus 698 FTE
CITY-NEAR Jacobs Telecommunications 441 FTE
CITY-NEAR Chief Specialty Packaging 422 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 3748 361 FTE
NAT-TCR 2929 S. Angus Ave 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Person Memorial Hospital 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR Bell Nursery - King George 1.9 TCR
NAT-TCR American International Chemical LLC 1.9 TCR
NAT-SIZE Wheatfield 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE South Haven 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Leatherwood/Blackey Medical Clinic 21 FTE
NAT-SIZE Humphreys County Utility District 21 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2019. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.