Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing · Wisconsin

Thomas Precision Inc

Rice Lake, WI · ~132 workers · 5 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
4.0
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thomas Precision Inc runs at 123% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Thomas Precision Inc: 4.0 TCR = 123% of Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 5y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thomas Precision Inc safety composite

Thomas Precision Inc scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 50% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 35%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

41/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
D 4.05 per 100 workers

Safer than 35% of industry peers

DART rate
D 1.48 per 100 workers

Safer than 41% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 50% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−1.1

2016→2023

Thomas Precision Inc injury rate improved

Thomas Precision Inc's TCR fell 1.1 from 4.8 in 2016 to 3.7 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2018 at 6.3 TCR. In 2023, DART was 0.37× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.8 · 2018=6.3 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=3.7

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333241 · Rice Lake, WI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 4.0 · 123% of ind

  • DART 1.5 DART
  • RANK #21/25
  • PHOTO SirSteak Machinery, …
  • BOOK 5y book
  • INJ 24 inj
  • SIZE ~132 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: SirSteak Machinery, Inc (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Wisconsin employers → · Look up another →

Thomas Precision Inc in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thomas Precision Inc averages 4.0 TCR (123% of the Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thomas Precision Inc TCR series: 2016=4.8 · 2018=6.3 · 2021=0.8 · 2022=4.6 · 2023=3.7 · BLS 3.3

Where Thomas Precision Inc falls in its industry

215 Food choppers, grinders, mixer establishments

Safer than 35% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.0.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Wisconsin alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #21 safest of 25 Food choppers, grinders, mixer employers in Wisconsin.

Thomas Precision Inc (132 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Thomas Precision Inc
Thomas Precision Inc (132 employees, TCR 4.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 85 employees and a TCR of 3.0

Thomas Precision Inc has more employees than the Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and sli median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.0. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 3.7 1.5 5 0 0
2022 4.6 2.3 6 0 0
2021 0.8 0.8 1 0 0
2018 6.3 1.6 8 0 0
2016 4.8 1.6 4 2 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333241 · WI · Rice Lake

215 Food choppers, grinders, mixers, and slicers (i.e., food manufacturing-type) manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 12,834 rated employers in Wisconsin with headcount on file · 44 employers in Rice Lake, WI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR SirSteak Machinery, Inc 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR BELSHAW BROS INC 4.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Marchant Schmidt 4.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR Baxter Manufacturing 4.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE ABS IntelliGen 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE RHD Plumbing, Inc 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE Otis Elevator Company-Milwaukee 132 FTE
STATE-SIZE SFC Gillett 333 132 FTE
CITY-NEAR Lakeview Medical Center 508 FTE
CITY-NEAR MMC- Rice Lake 435 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1446 398 FTE
CITY-NEAR Henry Repeating Arms - Rice Lake 394 FTE
NAT-TCR 1610 Barlow 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Chase Elementary School 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR Mobile Schillinger Dirt Cheap 4.0 TCR
NAT-TCR 210 East 64th Street 4.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Allied Mechanical 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Cook Plumbing Corporation 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE IFB Solutions - Arkansas 132 FTE
NAT-SIZE Select-Arc Ft. Loramie 132 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2021, 2018, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.