Landscape care and maintenance services · Texas

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture

Austin, TX · ~23 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

A
Excellent Safety Record
1.4
Avg TCR
4.5
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture runs at 30% of its industry's injury rate - far safer than the typical Landscape care and maintenance services workplace, earning a grade A.

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture: 1.4 TCR = 30% of Landscape care and maintenance services BLS 4.5 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture safety composite

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 88% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 52%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
B 1.36 per 100 workers

Safer than 88% of industry peers

DART rate
B 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 84% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 52% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture held a steady TCR band

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2022 to 0.0 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2023 at 4.1 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2022=0.0 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 561730 · Austin, TX AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade A · TCR 1.4 · 30% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #33/187
  • PHOTO WM Austin LLC
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 1 inj
  • SIZE ~23 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: WM Austin LLC (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture averages 1.4 TCR (30% of the Landscape care and maintenance services BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture TCR series: 2022=0 · 2023=4.1 · 2024=0 · BLS 4.5

Where Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture falls in its industry

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance establishments

Safer than 88% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 4.7.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #33 safest of 187 Landscape care and maintenance employers in Texas.

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture (23 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0200400600800 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture
Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture (23 employees, TCR 1.4) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 53 employees and a TCR of 4.7

Thompson + Hanson Austin Landscape Architecture has fewer employees than the Landscape care and maintenance services median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 4.7. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2023 4.1 0.0 1 0 0
2022 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

561730 · TX · Austin

2,875 Landscape care and maintenance services employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 1,645 employers in Austin, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR WM Austin LLC 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR 1006122031 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Wellington 35300 1.4 TCR
NAICS-TCR Asplundh Tree Expert, LLC - 636 1.4 TCR
STATE-SIZE Houston South Mill Distribution, LLC 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE Smallhold, Buda 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE AMARILLO SOD FARM 23 FTE
STATE-SIZE VISITORS MANAGEMENT 23 FTE
CITY-NEAR Ensign Services 11,325 FTE
CITY-NEAR NA-US-TX-Austin-Giga Texas 8,621 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-Loc: CORP LOC - US Austin 6,911 FTE
CITY-NEAR 6017-CORP LOC - USA UNITED STATES - AST 5,272 FTE
NAT-TCR Corporate 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TMX2234 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR TMX2071 1.4 TCR
NAT-TCR Patented Acquisition Corp DBA Think Patented 1.4 TCR
NAT-SIZE Piperin Corporation 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE City of La Salle Police Department 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Air Alliance Team 23 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hanvey Engineering 23 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.

Read our methodology - how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.

Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.