Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities · Texas

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney

Forney, TX · ~37 workers · 3 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

F
Failing Safety Record
10.5
Avg TCR
3.8
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney runs at 276% of its industry's injury rate - far more dangerous than the typical Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities workplace, earning a grade F.

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney: 10.5 TCR = 276% of Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS 3.8 · 3y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney safety composite

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on dart rate (safer than 11%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

F

28/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 10.47 per 100 workers

Safer than 28% of industry peers

DART rate
F 12.37 per 100 workers

Safer than 11% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

Rising injury rate

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney: 5.6 → 12.4 TCR

Peak year 2022 @ 13.5 TCR · DART/TCR 1.18× in 2023

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney's TCR rose 6.8 from 5.6 in 2020 to 12.4 in 2023. Peak filing year was 2022 at 13.5 TCR. In 2023, DART was 1.18× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 623311 · Forney, TX ABOVE-IND · SMALL

Grade F · TCR 10.5 · 276% of ind

  • DART 12.4 DART
  • RANK #185/220
  • PHOTO The Fountains at Riv…
  • BOOK 3y book
  • INJ 11 inj
  • SIZE ~37 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: The Fountains at RiverVue (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Texas employers → · Look up another →

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Three Forks Senior Living of Forney averages 10.5 TCR (276% of the Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney TCR series: 2020=5.6 · 2022=13.5 · 2023=12.4 · BLS 3.8

Where Three Forks Senior Living of Forney falls in its industry

4,127 Assisted-living facilities wit establishments

Safer than 28% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 6.9.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Texas alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #185 safest of 220 Assisted-living facilities wit employers in Texas.

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney (37 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 050100150200250 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Three Forks Senior Living of Forney
Three Forks Senior Living of Forney (37 employees, TCR 10.5) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 66 employees and a TCR of 6.9

Three Forks Senior Living of Forney has fewer employees than the Assisted-living facilities with on-site median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 6.9. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2023 12.4 12.4 5 0 0
2022 13.5 3.4 4 0 0
2020 5.6 0.0 2 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

623311 · TX · Forney

4,127 Assisted-living facilities with on-site nursing facilities employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 38,394 rated employers in Texas with headcount on file · 40 employers in Forney, TX · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR The Fountains at RiverVue 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR AmHealth (Evansville), Inc. 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Osborn 10.5 TCR
NAICS-TCR Applewood Estates 10.5 TCR
STATE-SIZE Fannin Growing 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Bovina Cattle Company 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Skyland Grain, LLC- Spearman Gin 37 FTE
STATE-SIZE Alura Cogen 37 FTE
CITY-NEAR Amazon.com Services LLC - FTW5 1,017 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 5191 391 FTE
CITY-NEAR 5191 381 FTE
CITY-NEAR Intex Electrical Contractors, Inc 293 FTE
NAT-TCR Valentia Service Center-153 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Razz Construction INc 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Michael Thomas Furniture, Inc. 10.5 TCR
NAT-TCR Hansen's IGA Neillsville 10.5 TCR
NAT-SIZE Northeast Hingham Plant 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE 043 Energy G&A 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Waterford Plant/Branch 37 FTE
NAT-SIZE Early Education Program-Hollywood 37 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2023, 2022, 2020. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.