Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing · Michigan

Thumb Tool & Engineering

Bad Axe, MI · ~192 workers · 9 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

D
Poor Safety Record
5.1
Avg TCR
3.3
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

Thumb Tool & Engineering runs at 155% of its industry's injury rate - more dangerous than the typical Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing workplace, earning a grade D.

Thumb Tool & Engineering: 5.1 TCR = 155% of Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS 3.3 · 9y Form 300A (see methodology below)

Thumb Tool & Engineering safety composite

Thumb Tool & Engineering scores strongest on fatalities (safer than 51% of same-industry peers) and weakest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 26%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

D

39/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
F 5.12 per 100 workers

Safer than 26% of industry peers

DART rate
D 0.61 per 100 workers

Safer than 46% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

TCR Δ

−2.0

2016→2024

Thumb Tool & Engineering injury rate improved

Thumb Tool & Engineering's TCR fell 2.0 from 4.4 in 2016 to 2.4 in 2024. Peak filing year was 2018 at 7.4 TCR. In 2024, DART was 0.12× this establishment's average TCR (severity share of cases).

2016=4.4 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.4

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 333514 · Bad Axe, MI ABOVE-IND · MID

Grade D · TCR 5.1 · 155% of ind

  • DART 0.6 DART
  • RANK #89/131
  • PHOTO Widell Industries Mi…
  • BOOK 9y book
  • INJ 62 inj
  • SIZE ~192 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: Widell Industries Michigan (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Michigan employers → · Look up another →

Thumb Tool & Engineering in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows Thumb Tool & Engineering averages 5.1 TCR (155% of the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

Thumb Tool & Engineering TCR series: 2016=4.4 · 2017=5.6 · 2018=7.4 · 2019=6.5 · 2020=5.3 · 2021=6.8 · 2022=6.5 · 2023=1.1 · 2024=2.4 · BLS 3.3

Where Thumb Tool & Engineering falls in its industry

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma establishments

Safer than 26% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 3.4.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Michigan alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #89 safest of 131 Cutting dies, metalworking, ma employers in Michigan.

Thumb Tool & Engineering (192 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 0100200300400500 051015 Average employees Total Case Rate Thumb Tool & Engineering
Thumb Tool & Engineering (192 employees, TCR 5.1) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 56 employees and a TCR of 3.4

Thumb Tool & Engineering has more employees than the Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturin median and a higher injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 3.4. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2024 2.4 0.6 2 2 0
2023 1.1 0.6 2 0 0
2022 6.5 3.2 9 3 0
2021 6.8 2.3 6 6 0
2020 5.3 2.4 6 3 0
2019 6.5 1.9 7 7 0
2018 7.4 5.3 16 1 0
2017 5.6 1.7 8 5 0
2016 4.4 1.3 6 4 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

333514 · MI · Bad Axe

387 Cutting dies, metalworking, manufacturing employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 16,393 rated employers in Michigan with headcount on file · 15 employers in Bad Axe, MI · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR Widell Industries Michigan 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Carr Lane Manufacturing - Texas 5.1 TCR
NAICS-TCR Nordson Xaloy Pulaski 5.2 TCR
NAICS-TCR THE CAPITAL TOOL COMPANY 5.1 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lakeshore Global 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Distribution Plant 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Michigan Operations - Hemlock HIMS Plant 192 FTE
STATE-SIZE Cannon-Muskegon Corporation 192 FTE
CITY-NEAR McLaren Thumb Region 306 FTE
CITY-NEAR 1592 266 FTE
CITY-NEAR WM 1592 255 FTE
CITY-NEAR 315 - Bad Axe 195 FTE
NAT-TCR Amazon.com Services LLC - SCA5 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 4123 Ohio Township 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR 8427 Los Banos 5.1 TCR
NAT-TCR Thomas Grady Service Center 5.1 TCR
NAT-SIZE Fresenius Kabi USA LLC and Fenwal Inc 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE BAM Logistics LLC 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Renaissance Baltimore Harborplace 192 FTE
NAT-SIZE Hotel Dupont 192 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2024, 2023, 2022, 2021, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.