Cement plant construction · Georgia

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta

Atlanta, GA · ~98 workers · 2 years of OSHA Injury Tracking Application data.

C
Average Safety Record
0.0
Avg TCR
2.9
Industry avg
0
Fatalities
Subscribe to safety-record updates (RSS)

The verdict

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta runs at 0% of its industry's injury rate - about level with the typical Cement plant construction workplace, earning a grade C.

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta: 0.0 TCR = 0% of Cement plant construction BLS 2.9 · 2y Form 300A (see methodology below)

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta safety composite

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta scores strongest on total case rate (tcr) (safer than 100% of same-industry peers) and weakest on fatalities (safer than 51%), blended into one 0-100 breakdown against same-industry peers. A missing measure drops out and redistributes its weight rather than deflating the score. This is a per-dimension breakdown, distinct from the single letter grade above it (which weights TCR alone against the BLS industry benchmark).

B

78/100

Percentile-weighted across 3 of 3 measures

Total Case Rate (TCR)
A 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 100% of industry peers

DART rate
C 0 per 100 workers

Safer than 73% of industry peers

Fatalities
D 0

Safer than 51% of industry peers

Benchmarked live against every credibly-rated employer in the same NAICS industry code in the current OSHA extract (a segment must have at least 8 rated peers to benchmark). Not a legal or compliance determination; PlainSafetyScore's own weighting (TCR 40%, DART 35%, fatalities 25%).

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta held a steady TCR band

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta's TCR held near 0.0 from 0.0 in 2016 to 0.0 in 2017. Peak filing year was 2016 at 0.0 TCR.

2016=0.0 · 2017=0.0

OSHA ITA Form 300A scorecard

Establishment book 236210 · Atlanta, GA AT/BELOW-IND · SMALL

Grade C · TCR 0.0 · 0% of ind

  • DART 0.0 DART
  • RANK #0/41
  • PHOTO DPR Construction - C…
  • BOOK 2y book
  • INJ 0 inj
  • SIZE ~98 FTE

Nearest TCR peer: DPR Construction - Corporate Services (0.0 TCR gap)

Read with this employer → · Industry book → · Georgia employers → · Look up another →

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta in the TCR neighbourhood

Average Total Case Rate among this establishment and nearest same-industry peers

TCR

What this shows thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta averages 0.0 TCR (0% of the Cement plant construction BLS benchmark).

Source U.S. Department of Labor, OSHA Injury Tracking Application (Form 300A) As of 2026-08-25

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta TCR series: 2016=0 · 2017=0 · BLS 2.9

Where thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta falls in its industry

924 Cement plant construction establishments

Safer than 100% of graded establishments in this industry, whose median TCR is 1.6.

More dangerous than peersSafer than peers

Narrower to Georgia alone (the establishments it most directly competes with for workers and contracts): ranked #0 safest of 41 Cement plant construction employers in Georgia.

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta (98 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6 2×2 strategic matrix plotting 30 entities by Average employees (X) and Total Case Rate (Y), with a crosshair dividing the plot into four quadrants. Larger & higher-riskSmaller & higher-riskLarger & saferSmaller & safer than peers 05001,0001,500 05101520 Average employees Total Case Rate thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta
thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta (98 employees, TCR 0.0) among 29 same-industry peers, split at the industry median of 71 employees and a TCR of 1.6

thyssenkrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. - Atlanta has more employees than the Cement plant construction median and a lower injury rate than the industry's median TCR of 1.6. Workforce size and injury rate do not always move together within the same industry -- some of its smaller peers run higher rates than its larger ones, and vice versa.

Year-by-Year Safety Data

Year TCR DART Injuries Illnesses Fatalities
2017 0.0 0.0 0 0 0
2016 0.0 0.0 0 0 0

OSHA ITA peer cross-reference

Establishment peer ledger

236210 · GA · Atlanta

924 Cement plant construction employers nationwide with a credible TCR · 14,941 rated employers in Georgia with headcount on file · 1,907 employers in Atlanta, GA · 4 cross-state NAT-TCR peers · 4 cross-state NAT-SIZE peers. Closest matches by relationship code are listed below.

Rel Establishment Metric
NAICS-TCR DPR Construction - Corporate Services 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR The Austin Co. 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR 8921 Lyondell Channelview PG 0.0 TCR
NAICS-TCR JEG AF DS4 0.0 TCR
STATE-SIZE Lake Park 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Americus Operating - 1020 Southerfield Road Americus, GA 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Taylor Morrison of Georgia, LLC 98 FTE
STATE-SIZE Parker Engineering and Mechanical, Inc. 98 FTE
CITY-NEAR Insight Global 20,586 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL Airport 19,423 FTE
CITY-NEAR Delta Air Lines - ATL- Airport 18,018 FTE
CITY-NEAR Northside 13,761 FTE
NAT-TCR Aviation Other : Virtual Employee Roll-Up Site 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR AZ-01 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR CT-02 0.0 TCR
NAT-TCR NJ-05 0.0 TCR
NAT-SIZE Washington N and R LLC dba Grandview Healthcare 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Autumn Care of Mocskville 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Peapod S&S West Danbury, Ct 98 FTE
NAT-SIZE Sunnking Inc. 98 FTE

Rel codes: NAICS-TCR · STATE-SIZE · CITY-NEAR · NAT-TCR/NAT-SIZE cross-state. Read with this employer →

Data Source: OSHA Injury Tracking Application (ITA), mandatory establishment-level injury/illness reports. Grades compare employer Total Case Rate (TCR) to BLS IIF industry benchmarks. Data covers years reported by this establishment: 2017, 2016. This is publicly available government data - not a legal determination of workplace conditions.
Data sourced from official public datasets. See our methodology for details.